Interesting. Seems like that would still allow for a lot of "local
discretion" however.
Keith Hughes
Peggie Hall wrote:
> Keith Hughes wrote:
>
>> Peggie,
>>
>> I would suggest that if there is no mention of 'devices' in the
>> definition of "Discharge", the the term "emitting" could easily be
>> construed to include direct human discharge whether there is an
>> interim device used or not. The definition is literally to "send
>> forth" either matter or energy.
>
>
> Theoretically you're correct. However, in actual practice the "emitting"
> of waste directly from a body into the water is permitted.
>
> Peggie
>
Rick Morel <rmorel@m*o*r*e*l*r.com> wrote in
news:n6o8t2pdl1nejfkatahanut841dqqb2uvv@:
> Might be wiser to immerse the involved body parts in
> the water in a crowded marina for obvious reasons. You just can't use
> any "device".
>
Is THAT why that lady on the next dock over was screaming obscenities at
me?! She just couldn't leave it alone...kept screaming about the
"environment". Damned greenies.....
HEAD, for boat with no HEAD. Wag Bag question .. 
