Per
sergey.kunkov@:
>Which ones are better? Easier to handle? Larger wind range?
I'm only experienced up to 7.5.
Having said that, one has to define "wind range".
If the definition includes not getting overwhelmed by killer
gusts when sailing ludicrously over-powered, I'd give the nod to
non-cammed sails. Reason: you can luff them and they go flat.
OTOH, you try to luff a cammed sail and the cams are still
creating a foil whether you want it or not.
OTOH, if you mean the ability to go into a hole, lose the wind,
and then come out of it as fast as possible; cams seem to have
the edge. Reason: when you finally do get a little wind on the
sail, it's already got a shape. You don't lose the time/energy
it takes to fill the sail. Same thing when responding to little
puffs in light air.
OTOOH, I'm guessing (maybe somebody who actually knows can
comment) that a few pumps on either sail creates a more-or-less
equal situation.
Easier to handle? I think it goes to camless no matter what.
"Better"? Neither one. "Horses for courses." It's a matter
of what one wants the sail to do and under what conditions they
want it done.
--
PeteCresswell