Carrying driver's licenses across states?

sechumlib wrote:
> On 2007-06-21 22:27:51 -0400, "J. Clarke" <jclarke.usenet@cox.net>
> said:
>
>> sechumlib wrote:
>>> On 2007-06-21 20:18:29 -0400, Dave Smith <adavidsmith@sympatico.ca>
>>> said:
>>>
>>>> "J. Clarke" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, if it happens "any day" then you shouldn't have any
>>>>>>> problem citing a case, now, should you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unfortunately, since these cases are rarely appealed they won't
>>>>>> be in legal references.
>>>>>
>>>>> Uh, there is a transcript made of just about every trial and those
>>>>> transcripts are public records. Please provide a reference to
>>>>> _one_ in which this occurred.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When did that start again? They have been taping trials for years
>>>> and there is not usually a transcript unless someone requests one,
>>>> in which case the court clerk has to sit down with the tape and
>>>> type it up. People don't usually ask for a transcript unless they
>>>> are planning on an appeal.
>>>
>>> This varies a lot from state to state and I seriously doubt the
>>> truth of the statement on a national scale. Anyway, it doesn't
>>> matter. The transcript of some local trial court's decision from
>>> the sticks, even if available, means absolutely nothing legally
>>> except to the actual parties involved.
>>
>> It means that such a scenario actually occurred in the real world
>> rather than in the imagination of some netizen.
>>
>>> No lawyer has the time or need to research such cases as
>>> "precedent". Anyone who thinks a lawyer should do so is showing
>>> total ignorance of the way the law works and has always worked.
>>
>> Who has suggested that "a lawyer" should "research such cases"? Are
>> you illiterate or something?
>
> Look at the previous language in this thread - that is, if you're not
> illiterate or something.

Which is simply a pathetic attempt on your part to obfuscate the total
lack of evidence.

--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:54:19 -0700, Hatunen <hatunen@cox.net> wrote:


>Fine. But the subject isn't financial planning and residency
>requirement vary by activity. For instance, simply registering
>your car, getting a DL, renting an apartment, and paying taxes in
>a state will not assure you of getting in-state tuition at a
>state university.

Often states will require a period of residency beforee allowing in
state tuition to prevent people from moving and immediately demanding
to pay in state tuition.

sechumlib wrote:
> On 2007-06-23 16:34:39 -0400, carolea7@ (Carole Allen)
> said:
>
>> If someone wants to rely on a case for legal purposes, it needs to be
>> a published case from an appellate level. Appellate courts issue
>> many decisions, not all of them are published, and most trial courts
>> disallow submission of unpublished cases.
>
> I tried to tell this to the dodo who brought the subject up, but he
> ignored it as though it had never been said. I hope you can do better.

I'm puzzled as to what you think that the appellate process has to do
with anything. The issue is not whether such a case is legal precedent,
the issue is whether such a case has occurred at all.

If you are going to continue to harp on the appellate process and the
validity of cases as precedent, then quite frankly you've got something
wrong with you.

--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)