 |
5th September 2008, 04:14 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Guest | What is happening with 55016? Read rumours of scrapping, of sales to DRS, wjat is actually happening
please? | |
| |
7th September 2008, 05:33 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Guest | What is happening with 55016? On Sep 7, 9:58 pm, "Jack Taylor" <J...@Carney.co.uk> wrote:
> If all he wants is the bogies, then just doing a bogie swap would still
> result in a loco that he could sell on. There's very little internally
> that's of much use elsewhere
The insides of a deltic were never much use IMHO.
Strip out 55016 and fit a 16CSVT and make a DP2 out of it I say.
--
Nick | |
| |
8th September 2008, 04:28 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Guest | What is happening with 55016? Tony Polson wrote:
> D7666 <d7666@m> wrote:
>
>> The insides of a deltic were never much use IMHO.
>>
>> Strip out 55016 and fit a 16CSVT and make a DP2 out of it I say.
>
> Now *that* is a good idea. ;-)
Oh, I don't know. I quite like the idea of a pair of MTUs myself! ;-) | |
| |
8th September 2008, 05:12 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Guest | What is happening with 55016? On Sep 8, 9:28 pm, "Jack Taylor" <J...@Carney.co.uk> wrote:
> >> Strip out 55016 and fit a 16CSVT and make a DP2 out of it I say.
> > Now *that* is a good idea. ;-)
> Oh, I don't know. I quite like the idea of a pair of MTUs myself! ;-)
A pair of Rolls Royce Merlins has cossed my mind in the past.
Or Darts.
Anything better than that infernal deltic racket.
--
Nick | |
| |
9th September 2008, 02:05 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Guest | What is happening with 55016? On Sep 8, 9:28 pm, "Jack Taylor" <J...@Carney.co.uk> wrote:
> Oh, I don't know. I quite like the idea of a pair of MTUs myself! ;-)
A pair of Rolls Royce Merlins - or 4 if they will fit.
--
Nick | |
| |
11th September 2008, 09:50 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Guest | What is happening with 55016? On Sep 11, 1:57 pm, a...@aber.ac.uk (Andrew Robert Breen) wrote:
> >> I do wonder if at least the last two V-bomber designs (Vulcan, Victor)
> >> were specifically /designed/ to look frightening.
> >Did you think that? I thought the the Victor looked rather odd, the
> The Victor, with its crew pod at the nose end of a slim fuselage, always
> reminds me of one of those parasitic wasps. Both beautiful and disturbing
> that the same time.
I think the Victor was both a menacing looking machine and one of the
best if not the best of all military aircraft.
When I was working in Wellingborough used to see them regularly at not
a great height to/from their base (somewhere in Lincolnshire ?).
--
Nick | |
| |
11th September 2008, 12:01 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Guest | What is happening with 55016? On Sep 11, 3:28 pm, Tony Polson <docnews2...@> wrote:
> D7666 <d7...@m> wrote:
>
> >I think the Victor was both a menacing looking machine and one of the
> >best if not the best of all military aircraft.
>
> "The best" by what definition?
Sorry, my fault, not clear, I meant ''best looking'', as you
suggested:
> If you mean the best-looking, that's arguable,
I'd not argue with what is or not best looking, but argue that it is
an entirely subjective issue.
Dropping back to original subject matter, I detest deltic noise - and
thats subjective too. I use the word noise quite clearly. deltics make
a noise, other locos make sounds. Deltics make a quantity of racket
whereas there are many other machines where I prefer the quality of
sound, even if it is less.
McMullen AK is one of my favourite ales - also subjective.
And so on.
--
Nick | |
| |
11th September 2008, 01:15 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Guest | What is happening with 55016? On Sep 11, 6:04 pm, Tony Polson <docnews2...@> wrote:
> Curious that you should choose to snip my phrase that followed
> immediately after the text you did quote, where I described it as "a
> masterpiece of design", and argued about "arguable" instead. ;-)
;o)
--
Nick | |
| |  |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:12 PM. | | |