In article <EGs7b.738$B55.220@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net>, Scooby dooby
<dontcallme@homeillcallyou.com> wrote:
> > It isn't mad. As has been pointed out before - many times - the
> > contrasting doors help partially sighted people to see where the doors
> >are so that they can walk towards them just as normally sighted people
> >do. One partially sighted person may not need them, but I'm sure that a
> >lot of others are helped.
> I'd love to meet one, just one partially sighted human being that has
> honestly found the change very useful. Hell, make that even mildy
> useful. Because so far...... I haven't.
I have certainly met several people - including some fully sighted people -
who have found the contrasting colours useful.
> If it honestly really were highly useful and desirable, there would no
> doubt be legislation passed for every emergency exit in every building,
> every aeroplane, every bus etc., to be in a contrasting colour. But no.
> This is the country that shows people running on fire fire/emergency
> exit signs. The exact thing that people shouldn't (usually) do. Someone,
> somewhere, really needs to get a grip.
It isn't to do with safety, particularly; just that if people can see where
the doors are they can move to the right place easily.
--
__ __ __ __ __ ___ _____________________________________________
|__||__)/ __/ \|\ ||_ | / Acorn StrongArm Risc_PC
| || \\__/\__/| \||__ | /...Internet access for all Acorn RISC machines
___________________________/
dhwild@argonet.co.uk