Philistines On 4 Oct, 11:47, "Paul Scott" <notvalidpmsc...@> wrote:
> "Gibbo" <gi...@smartgauge.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> news:5mju5tFe1ke6U1@mid....
>
> > Canaldrifter wrote:
> >> Obviously, if it was a valuable natural site it would have a SSSI on
> >> it so they wouldn't be able to develop it.
>
> >> It is a pleasant place to moor and watch ducks, but we do need
> >> moorings. I was delighted to find that there are at least two major
> >> marina developments on the northern Lancaster canal, giving something
> >> like 130 new berths. However there are plenty of 14 day moorings
> >> available there. Unfortunately, those who abuse them are unlikely to
> >> be able to afford the mooring fees that will be charged.
>
> > I think I detect a touch of NIMBY in the OP.
>
> A bit of googling suggests objections to a number of marinas in the area -
> perhaps the OP has connections with some of the existing moorings?
Somebody with a vested interest objecting to new development? Heaven
forbid!
I read somewhere (in a newspaper? I forget which one) that almost all
britons would agree with a statement like "The UK has a housing
shortage" but very few with "More houses should be built in my
neighbourhood!".
We're a nation of NIMBYs ;-) |