| UK Air Travel Forum A specialized air travel forum for residents of the UK and/or dealing with flights originating in the UK. |  | |
28th December 2005, 10:10 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Guest | Let's get Concorde flying again! In article <1135777697.062771.98150@g49g2000cwa.. com>,
Concorde <concorde@kulwant.net> wrote:
> Please spare a minute to show your support for Concorde...
It's a noisy, fuel-wasting dinosaur. I'll pass. | |
| |
28th December 2005, 11:56 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Guest | Let's get Concorde flying again!
> If it's a dinosaur, then why is it more advanced than anything
> in commercial service today?
>
In what way pray is it more "advanced" than,say, an airbus?
David | |
| |
28th December 2005, 12:40 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Guest | Let's get Concorde flying again! Paul <Paul wrote:
> The hoy poloi
That's about the fastest way of demonstrating that you are one of the
unwashed herd. | |
| |
28th December 2005, 01:00 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Guest | Let's get Concorde flying again! On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:40:51 +0000, Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk>
wrote:
>Paul <Paul wrote:
>
>> The hoy poloi
>
>That's about the fastest way of demonstrating that you are one of the
>unwashed herd.
Could we add the phrase "well heeled" some where in the above
sentence!!?? Just before unwashed would do.
Paul. | |
| |
28th December 2005, 01:22 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Guest | Let's get Concorde flying again! On 28 Dec 2005 09:35:42 -0800, geoffm@u1.netgate.net (Geoff Miller)
wrote:
>Which, while well and good, has nothing to do with the matter of
>whether the Concorde is advanced.
It was advanced it no longer is. It is out dated. Now stop talking
like a thick job. Go and watch TV, listen to the radio but leave this
topic to the big lads. There's a good boy!
Carstairs-MacKracken | |
| |
28th December 2005, 03:12 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Guest | Let's get Concorde flying again! On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:57:08 +0000, Roland Perry <roland@perry.co.uk>
wrote:
>The same logic can be applied to the Space Shuttle.
And that is a total waist of American taxpayers money and also a waste
of space . | |
| |
28th December 2005, 03:18 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Guest | Let's get Concorde flying again! In article <doujag$ibp$3@genet.malloc.co.uk>, Steve Firth
<%steve%@malloc.co.uk> writes
>Paul <Paul wrote:
>
>> The hoy poloi
>
>That's about the fastest way of demonstrating that you are one of the
>unwashed herd.
Children, children, no need to squabble. After all who speaks ancient
Greek these days?
--
Mike Lindsay | |
| |
28th December 2005, 03:55 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Guest | Let's get Concorde flying again! On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 20:36:33 +0000, Philip W Lee
<phil(at)lee(hyphen)family(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
>No aircraft can fly safely under the conditions imposed on it by
>incompetent operating staff
Were they incompetent? | |
| |
28th December 2005, 05:03 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Guest | Let's get Concorde flying again! On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:39:51 +0000, Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk>
wrote:
>I wish that people would learn how to post to Usenet.
Get a grip on yourself. Stop acting and talking like an absolute
numpty. You are verging on being an embarrassment to yourself.
Carstairs-MacKracken | |
| |
28th December 2005, 05:11 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Guest | Let's get Concorde flying again! On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:14:40 +0000, Philip W Lee
<phil(at)lee(hyphen)family(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
>Having studied the investigative reports in detail, I would have been
>happy to fly on concorde the next day, but you couldn't pay me enough
>to fly Air France.
They may be expencive but the only time I feel safe in the air is when
I am on board a British Airways aircraft . | |
| |  | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 AM. | | |