+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Tire question

  1. #1
    Built_Well
    Guest Built_Well's Avatar

    Default Tire question

    Hi gang! Well, time to rotate tires and change oil again. My '06 Camry's

    manual calls for simple front-to-rear tire rotation, keeping the tires on

    the * same side * of the car. However, my tires are not uni-directional

    tires (there is no arrow displayed on the sidewall), so I was wondering if

    it would be okay on the Camry LE to rotate its tires front to rear and

    criss-cross the rear tires to the front, so eventually every tire will do

    service at each of the 4 axles? This would seem to me to provide the most

    even wear on each of the 4 tires. Anything wrong with my plan? And why

    would the manual instruct owners to rotate tires as if the tires were

    uni-directional, even though the tires are not unidirectional? The

    manual's method keeps tires on the same side of the vehicle forever.

    Thanks very much in advance :-)


  2. #2
    ron
    Guest ron's Avatar

    Default Tire question

    as Ray & Jeff state "X" rotation went out years ago.

  3. #3
    T & K kloth
    Guest T & K kloth's Avatar

    Default Tire question

    "ron" <randus3@teranews.com> wrote in message
    news:MGZTl.78539$uD3.26371@newsfe20.iad...
    > as Ray & Jeff state "X" rotation went out years ago.
    >
    >


    Ron,

    Michelin is currently recommending an "X" rotation for their tires on new
    cars.

    Tim

  4. #4
    HLS
    Guest HLS's Avatar

    Default Tire question

    "T & K kloth" <tkloth@wans.net> wrote in message
    news:M4DUl.30870$Ws1.840@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com...

    > I had the same question on my Avalon with Michelin tires. I emailed
    > Michelin. They said to (for front wheel drive car) move the front tires
    > straight back and to cross the rear tires to the opposite side front.
    > They
    > also suggested a 6000-8000 mile rotation interval unless you see uneven
    > wear.
    >
    > Tim K


    I also have an Avalon. Michelins, even with rotation, lasted less than 30K.
    These tires don't have a long treadlife.

    I just replaced them with Kumho Platinums, assymetric, with 60K treadlife.
    So far, they are great.

  5. #5
    bogusmailmark
    Guest bogusmailmark's Avatar

    Default Tire question

    Next time I plan on driving 250 mph or re-fitting my Concorde I'll
    insist on Michelin. Until then I'll go with something that offers a
    far better ROI.

    On May 31, 8:55*pm, johngd...@***********m wrote:
    > Only Michelin runs on the world's fastest production cars (>250MPH
    > Bugatti Veyron) and they came up with an aviation tire solution after
    > the Concord accident in Paris that every other company is now using.
    > (That Concord was using GoodYear).
    >
    > Why would anyone want anything less than a Michelin?
    >

  6. #6
    HLS
    Guest HLS's Avatar

    Default Tire question


    >
    > I also have an Avalon. Michelins, even with rotation, lasted less than
    > 30K.
    > These tires don't have a long treadlife.
    >
    > I just replaced them with Kumho Platinums, assymetric, with 60K treadlife.
    > So far, they are great.
    >


    Let me be a little more specific. These PARTICULAR Michelins don't seem to
    have
    a long treadlife.

    I have had several sets of Michelins of other types, on other cars, and have
    gotten
    ca 70K out of them. I am in general a strong supporter of Michelin.

    I had looked into buying a Porsche but was put off by the expensive tires
    which had to
    be changed very frequently ( 15-20K miles or so). They were that way to
    give the ride
    that many Porsche owners wanted. Same for Avalon, I think.

  7. #7
    HLS
    Guest HLS's Avatar

    Default Tire question

    "T & K kloth" <tkloth@wans.net> wrote in message
    news:jABVl.25093$as4.18927@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
    >
    >> >
    >> > I also have an Avalon. Michelins, even with rotation, lasted less than
    >> > 30K.
    >> > These tires don't have a long treadlife.
    >> >

    >
    > This is surprising. I bought Michelins for my old Camry not too long ago.


    ####Your old Camry didn't come with this type of tire. (and it IS a fairly
    expensive tire...I believe they were $185 each to replace) It is VERY
    possible
    to buy Michelins that will give you 70-80k for some applications.

    > The original Michelins on the car had 85K+ miles on them. The least
    > expensive Michelins I could find had a 45K mile tread life. I think
    > something else is going on here. Were the tires properly inflated? Did
    > they wear evenly?


    ####The tires were properly inflated, and were rotated. They wore very
    evenly and had great traction. I couldn't believe it either, but found them
    on
    Tire Rack and other users who reviewed tdhem seem to have similar results.


    >Do you like to smoke the tires when pulling away from the light?
    >Wait, I take that last question back. I don't think that's possible with
    >an Avalon.


    It would be very possible with this one, but - no - I don't smoke the tires.

  8. #8
    johngdole
    Guest johngdole's Avatar

    Default Tire question

    That's right. The Michelin Primacy at Costco is about $125 w/
    installation. And these have a 600 tread rating (approx 60K miles)
    with a 60K mile warranty. And if people are saying the cheap
    Bridgestones last only 15-20K miles then owners shouldn't pay more
    than $35-50 having a Bridgestone installed (otherwise these cheap
    tires would cost too much).

    On Jun 3, 1:07*pm, "T & K kloth" <tkl...@wans.net> wrote:
    > This is surprising. *I bought Michelins for my old Camry not too long ago.
    > The original Michelins on the car had 85K+ miles on them. *The least
    > expensive Michelins I could find had a 45K mile tread life. *I think
    > something else is going on here. *Were the tires properly inflated? *Did
    > they wear evenly? *Do you like to smoke the tires when pulling away from the
    > light? *Wait, I take that last question back. *I don't think that's possible
    > with an Avalon.
    >
    > Tim K
    > 1997 Avalon > 2003 Camry > 2008 Avalon

  9. #9
    HLS
    Guest HLS's Avatar

    Default Tire question

    <johngdole@***********m> wrote in message
    news:7c014bf0-7c88-4525-a644-3da0f860f540@p4g2000vba.************.com...
    That's right. The Michelin Primacy at Costco is about $125 w/
    installation. And these have a 600 tread rating (approx 60K miles)
    with a 60K mile warranty. And if people are saying the cheap
    Bridgestones last only 15-20K miles then owners shouldn't pay more
    than $35-50 having a Bridgestone installed (otherwise these cheap
    tires would cost too much).

    Tire Rack shows my originals should have been Michelin Energy MVX4s.
    UTQC is 440. They are now $177 each, plus shipping, mounting, etc.

  10. #10
    HLS
    Guest HLS's Avatar

    Default Tire question

    "Mike" <mikehunt2@lycos.com> wrote in message
    news:4a2b0fc8$0$22938$ce5e7886@news-radius.ptd.net...
    > Toyota uses Bridgestone tires because it is a Japanese company and the Jap
    > only buy from other Japs whenever possible


    Neither of my new Toyotas came with Bridgestones. They BOTH came with
    Michelins.

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO 3.5.0 RC2