Landing Anywhere...

On May 22, 1:40 pm, Jim Logajan <Jam...@Lugoj.com> wrote:
> "Robert M. Gary" <N70...@**********> wrote:

> It appears that for part 135 operations that 135.229(a) specifies some
> minimal requirements. (At least by the liberal definition of "airport" in
> FAR 1.1.)
>
> So the FARs don't appear to be entirely silent on the subject.

Probably unlikely that the OP is flying part 135. However, if he is he
also has weather reporting requirements.
-Robert

"Robert M. Gary" <N7093v@**********> wrote:
> On May 22, 1:40 pm, Jim Logajan <Jam...@Lugoj.com> wrote:
>> "Robert M. Gary" <N70...@**********> wrote:
>
>> It appears that for part 135 operations that 135.229(a) specifies
>> some minimal requirements. (At least by the liberal definition of
>> "airport" in FAR 1.1.)
>>
>> So the FARs don't appear to be entirely silent on the subject.
>
> Probably unlikely that the OP is flying part 135. However, if he is he
> also has weather reporting requirements.

True. I actually wasn't expecting to find anything in the FARs on landing
restrictions since I'd done a previous scan and came up with nothing. The
135.229(a) is a bit of a stretch anyway - just thought I'd mention it.

Everything you said about local jurisdiction is correct. I seem to recall
that there may also be Federal laws or non-FAA regulations relating to
landing restrictions on certain Federal lands and property.