172M and a 172N On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:14:45 GMT, "Cecil E. Chapman"
<bayareapilot@> wrote:
>Solved my own mystery,,, the portion of the POH regarding spins ACTUALLY
>only has the admonition against spins in the 172N if the flaps are extended.
>
>Thanks everyone,,, :)
Glad you took the time to actually read the POH (rather than the
"owners guide". :-)
Now, and please don't think I'm trying to criticize, but you might
want to trim the size of your "sig" down to one or two lines. The
present one looks more like a resume ( or curriculm vitae) than a
usenet-style signature.
--
Jay (remove dashes for legal email address) |