Rod Machado's New PPL Manual

I have just received a copy of Rod Machado's Private Pilot Handbook
Second Edition from the publisher to review.

I haven't had a chance to read all of it yet, but just from what I've
seen thus far, I have no doubt whatsoever that I will be recommending
this book as a study manual to all student pilots.

This hard cover top quality heavyweight glossy paper
manual is the most well written and comprehensive work I have ever seen
done by anyone in the industry.

Throughout my career as a CFI I have always used and recommended Bill
Kershner's fine manuals, and these are still fine books today.
But what Rod has done with his books is absolutely amazing. The
presentation is not only accurate, but done with the "average person"
and "everyday pilot" in mind. Rod takes the most complicated of issues
and presents them intelligently and with a splash of humor that is
unbelievably educational. The drawings and graphics are exceptional.
I can't stress enough my positive opinion of this book.
--
Dudley Henriques

On Mar 24, 3:12 pm, Dudley Henriques <dhenriq...@rcn.com> wrote:
> I have just received a copy of Rod Machado's Private Pilot Handbook
> Second Edition from the publisher to review.
>
> I haven't had a chance to read all of it yet, but just from what I've
> seen thus far, I have no doubt whatsoever that I will be recommending
> this book as a study manual to all student pilots.
>
> This hard cover top quality heavyweight glossy paper
> manual is the most well written and comprehensive work I have ever seen
> done by anyone in the industry.
>
> Throughout my career as a CFI I have always used and recommended Bill
> Kershner's fine manuals, and these are still fine books today.
> But what Rod has done with his books is absolutely amazing. The
> presentation is not only accurate, but done with the "average person"
> and "everyday pilot" in mind. Rod takes the most complicated of issues
> and presents them intelligently and with a splash of humor that is
> unbelievably educational. The drawings and graphics are exceptional.
> I can't stress enough my positive opinion of this book.
> --
> Dudley Henriques

I have Rod M's Instrument book. It's very good - the only issue I have
with the book is that the layout is very busy -- even distracting.

Has the layout been tamed in the PPL texts?

I have one of each -- Jepp, ASA, Kershner -- and all the Gleim. I find
the Gleim's are good for just before the test (practical and
knowledge), the Jepps are the best designed and laid out, and the ASA
series is a very close second and much more reasonably priced.

The Kershner books are very good, but the presentation is dated,
compared to the ASA and Jepp.

Dan Mc

Dan wrote:
> On Mar 24, 3:12 pm, Dudley Henriques <dhenriq...@rcn.com> wrote:
>> I have just received a copy of Rod Machado's Private Pilot Handbook
>> Second Edition from the publisher to review.
>>
>> I haven't had a chance to read all of it yet, but just from what I've
>> seen thus far, I have no doubt whatsoever that I will be recommending
>> this book as a study manual to all student pilots.
>>
>> This hard cover top quality heavyweight glossy paper
>> manual is the most well written and comprehensive work I have ever seen
>> done by anyone in the industry.
>>
>> Throughout my career as a CFI I have always used and recommended Bill
>> Kershner's fine manuals, and these are still fine books today.
>> But what Rod has done with his books is absolutely amazing. The
>> presentation is not only accurate, but done with the "average person"
>> and "everyday pilot" in mind. Rod takes the most complicated of issues
>> and presents them intelligently and with a splash of humor that is
>> unbelievably educational. The drawings and graphics are exceptional.
>> I can't stress enough my positive opinion of this book.
>> --
>> Dudley Henriques
>
> I have Rod M's Instrument book. It's very good - the only issue I have
> with the book is that the layout is very busy -- even distracting.
>
> Has the layout been tamed in the PPL texts?
>
> I have one of each -- Jepp, ASA, Kershner -- and all the Gleim. I find
> the Gleim's are good for just before the test (practical and
> knowledge), the Jepps are the best designed and laid out, and the ASA
> series is a very close second and much more reasonably priced.
>
> The Kershner books are very good, but the presentation is dated,
> compared to the ASA and Jepp.
>
> Dan Mc

All of these books are good, each in it's own way.

I think what's been lacking for many years in the business has been a
manual totally designed for the "average Joe" or if you will, the
housewife next door who wants to enter General Aviation and possibly
learn to fly.

Through the years I've seen one after another of this type of person
take the initial step and seek an introductory flight, then be
intimidated by the complexity of the system and the manuals as they were
presented to them. Many have simply not gone further and been lost.
This isn't to say that the manuals are not sufficient or well done. They
are. I simply believe that Machado has bridged a gap that might go a
long way to solving this "initial impression" loss issue.

I have believed for many moons that there exists in General Aviation a
totally unnecessary trend toward the macho image for the GA pilot. It's
this very self envisioned image that drives away many "average people"
who would otherwise give aviation a try.

Machado addresses this issue head on with his books. Although not overly
simplified, his free wheeling style addresses the flying issues in a
manner that tends NOT to intimidate the reader. I personally find great
value in this, as it fills a gap in GA that desperately needs to be
filled if GA is to progress into the future.

GA was never meant for test pilots and engineers alone. If GA is to
flourish in the future, it will have to attract more "average" people
into it's ranks.
Rod Machado has gone a long long way toward filling this gap.



--
Dudley Henriques

On Mar 24, 7:01 pm, Larry Dighera <LDigh...@att.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:47:35 -0400, Dudley Henriques
>
> <dhenriq...@rcn.com> wrote:
> >GA was never meant for test pilots and engineers alone. If GA is to
> >flourish in the future, it will have to attract more "average" people
> >into it's ranks.
>
> Isn't that the philosophy of NASA's Free Flight concept?

Most people are only comfortable flying along with a herd. Try
diverting the typical 737 load into the requisite 30 Bonanzas and hear
the howls on the tarmac --" I have to fly in THAT!?"

It sounds good, but I think it's an unrealistic expectation.

Dan Mc

Larry Dighera wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:47:35 -0400, Dudley Henriques
> <dhenriques@rcn.com> wrote:
>
>> GA was never meant for test pilots and engineers alone. If GA is to
>> flourish in the future, it will have to attract more "average" people
>> into it's ranks.
>
> Isn't that the philosophy of NASA's Free Flight concept?

Sounds more to me like NASA coming up with another excuse for spending a
ton of our tax dollars :-)

What I have in mind is a bit more achievable; manuals written so that
they don't intimidate the section of the market that doesn't respond
positively to an " engineering approach" to ground school, and CFI's who
come to realize the value of learning how to project complicated
subjects in a manner that makes a housewife as comfortable in the
learning process as an engineer.



--
Dudley Henriques

On Mar 24, 8:05 pm, Dudley Henriques <dhenriq...@rcn.com> wrote:

> > Please -- before you flame .. I'm sure there are plenty of FBOs/Pilot
> > Schools that do it all perfectly.
>
> > But apparently they are the minority or we wouldn't have a shrinking
> > GA population.
>
> > Dan Mc
>
> No need to flame. In fact what you are saying here is simply restating
> what I've been saying.
>
> --
> Dudley Henriques

Sorry, I wasn't directed that comment to you directly, but to the know-
it-alls who live to pounce, but probably haven't ever darkened a
hangar floor.

Dan wrote:
> On Mar 24, 8:05 pm, Dudley Henriques <dhenriq...@rcn.com> wrote:
>
>>> Please -- before you flame .. I'm sure there are plenty of FBOs/Pilot
>>> Schools that do it all perfectly.
>>> But apparently they are the minority or we wouldn't have a shrinking
>>> GA population.
>>> Dan Mc
>> No need to flame. In fact what you are saying here is simply restating
>> what I've been saying.
>>
>> --
>> Dudley Henriques
>
> Sorry, I wasn't directed that comment to you directly, but to the know-
> it-alls who live to pounce, but probably haven't ever darkened a
> hangar floor.
>
>
>

I have one above now. See Maxwell. He likes to chime in with "useful and
relevant comment" once in awhile :-))))))))))))))))))

--
Dudley Henriques

Larry Dighera wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:57:50 -0700 (PDT), Dan <danmc61@>
> wrote:
>
>> Please -- before you flame .. I'm sure there are plenty of FBOs/Pilot
>> Schools that do it all perfectly.
>>
>> But apparently they are the minority or we wouldn't have a shrinking
>> GA population.
>
> I don't see the down turn in new students as a result of the failure
> of flight schools to attract unsuitable students. I believe it's the
> result of the high cost of training and operating, the continual
> necessity for ongoing currency flights, the less than perfect utility
> offered by GA, and the enormous time commitment demanded. Time,
> money, and price performance ratio are paramount; overwhelming desire
> to ply the skies is imperative, IMO.

All of these points are pertinent. There are as well HUGE issues
concerning the manner in which many flight schools and instructors
integrate with new students. Much could be done to improve the general
business model.

--
Dudley Henriques

On Mar 25, 4:46 am, Dudley Henriques <dhenriq...@rcn.com> wrote:

> I've spent over 50 years involved
> in the flight instruction business

No kidding, you only mention this in every other post you make...

"buttman" <nbvFOUR@> wrote in message
news:99d9b826-5ef2-4806-95ed-2aed85320c49@a23g2000hsc..com...
On Mar 25, 4:46 am, Dudley Henriques <dhenriq...@rcn.com> wrote:

> I've spent over 50 years involved
> in the flight instruction business

:>No kidding, you only mention this in every other post you make...

Only when he needs to demonstrate his credentials to a clueless dimwit.