Landing without flaps

On Mar 3, 1:27 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:
> On Mar 3, 12:04 pm, Gig 601XL Builder <wrgiac...@REMOVE>
> wrote:
>
> > Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>
> > > I had a great Instructor, he was strict and informative.
> > > While doing our bank instruction - up to 60 degs - he
> > > gently admonished that my ball was not centered.
> > > He went on to explain that most pilots bank left to
> > > site see and also in the circuit, so the left tank may
> > > fill up from the right if your uncoordinated and too
> > > lax to coordinate turns while site seeing.
>
> > It sort of depends on the aircraft and its' fuel system.
>
> Of course, Cessna 150/2 herein.
> Ken

Go out, do a long slip, and report back as to how much
imbalance occurs.

Dan

Hi Mr. **BIG HEAD**

On Mar 3, 1:38 pm, Dan_Thomas_nos...m wrote:
> On Mar 3, 1:27 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:

> > On Mar 3, 12:04 pm, Gig 601XL Builder <wrgiac...@REMOVE>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>
> > > > I had a great Instructor, he was strict and informative.
> > > > While doing our bank instruction - up to 60 degs - he
> > > > gently admonished that my ball was not centered.
> > > > He went on to explain that most pilots bank left to
> > > > site see and also in the circuit, so the left tank may
> > > > fill up from the right if your uncoordinated and too
> > > > lax to coordinate turns while site seeing.
>
> > > It sort of depends on the aircraft and its' fuel system.
>
> > Of course, Cessna 150/2 herein.
> > Ken
>
> Go out, do a long slip, and report back as to how much
> imbalance occurs.
> Dan

So you advocate SOP in an F104 would be ok
with one wing tip tank empty and another one
full...The purpose of training is make the new
pilot AWARE, they have to become part of the
airplane they are flying. That's a vital part of
learning how to fly REAL A/C, something you
BIG HEAD have very limited experience with.

Good thing I'm here to back-stop this operation.
Ken

"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@vianet.on.ca> wrote in news:1e53e789-854e-
4068-8ebb-b519b2bece00@e23g2000prf..com:

> Hi Mr. **BIG HEAD**
>
> On Mar 3, 1:38 pm, Dan_Thomas_nos...m wrote:
>> On Mar 3, 1:27 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:
>
>> > On Mar 3, 12:04 pm, Gig 601XL Builder <wrgiac...@REMOVE>
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > > Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>>
>> > > > I had a great Instructor, he was strict and informative.
>> > > > While doing our bank instruction - up to 60 degs - he
>> > > > gently admonished that my ball was not centered.
>> > > > He went on to explain that most pilots bank left to
>> > > > site see and also in the circuit, so the left tank may
>> > > > fill up from the right if your uncoordinated and too
>> > > > lax to coordinate turns while site seeing.
>>
>> > > It sort of depends on the aircraft and its' fuel system.
>>
>> > Of course, Cessna 150/2 herein.
>> > Ken
>>
>> Go out, do a long slip, and report back as to how much
>> imbalance occurs.
>> Dan
>
> So you advocate SOP in an F104 would be ok
> with one wing tip tank empty and another one
> full...The purpose of training is make the new
> pilot AWARE, they have to become part of the
> airplane they are flying. That's a vital part of
> learning how to fly REAL A/C, something you
> BIG HEAD have very limited experience with.
>
> Good thing I'm here to back-stop this operation.

See what I mean? How is one supposed to deal with this level of
cluelessness? It's monumental.


Bertie

"Owner" <Owner@noemail.com> wrote in news:47cc7d56$0$4965
$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" <AA@AA.AA> wrote in message
> news:fqhsfq$lih$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>> "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@vianet.on.ca> wrote in news:1e53e789-854e-
>> 4068-8ebb-b519b2bece00@e23g2000prf..com:
>>
>>> Hi Mr. **BIG HEAD**
>>>
>>> On Mar 3, 1:38 pm, Dan_Thomas_nos...m wrote:
>>>> On Mar 3, 1:27 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> > On Mar 3, 12:04 pm, Gig 601XL Builder <wrgiac...@REMOVE>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > > Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > > > I had a great Instructor, he was strict and informative.
>>>> > > > While doing our bank instruction - up to 60 degs - he
>>>> > > > gently admonished that my ball was not centered.
>>>> > > > He went on to explain that most pilots bank left to
>>>> > > > site see and also in the circuit, so the left tank may
>>>> > > > fill up from the right if your uncoordinated and too
>>>> > > > lax to coordinate turns while site seeing.
>>>>
>>>> > > It sort of depends on the aircraft and its' fuel system.
>>>>
>>>> > Of course, Cessna 150/2 herein.
>>>> > Ken
>>>>
>>>> Go out, do a long slip, and report back as to how much
>>>> imbalance occurs.
>>>> Dan
>>>
>>> So you advocate SOP in an F104 would be ok
>>> with one wing tip tank empty and another one
>>> full...The purpose of training is make the new
>>> pilot AWARE, they have to become part of the
>>> airplane they are flying. That's a vital part of
>>> learning how to fly REAL A/C, something you
>>> BIG HEAD have very limited experience with.
>>>
>>> Good thing I'm here to back-stop this operation.
>>
>> See what I mean? How is one supposed to deal with this level of
>> cluelessness? It's monumental.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>>
>
> Though it's good to know Ken is available as a back-stop if needed ;)
>
>
Do yuo think he's got enough brains to stand still?

Bertie
>

"Owner" <Owner@noemail.com> wrote in news:47ccaa93$0$4951
$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" <AA@AA.AA> wrote in message
> news:fqhue1$qdm$2@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>> "Owner" <Owner@noemail.com> wrote in news:47cc7d56$0$4965
>> $4c368faf@roadrunner.com:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" <AA@AA.AA> wrote in message
>>> news:fqhsfq$lih$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>>>> "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@vianet.on.ca> wrote in news:1e53e789-
854e-
>>>> 4068-8ebb-b519b2bece00@e23g2000prf..com:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Mr. **BIG HEAD**
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 3, 1:38 pm, Dan_Thomas_nos...m wrote:
>>>>>> On Mar 3, 1:27 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> > On Mar 3, 12:04 pm, Gig 601XL Builder <wrgiac...
@REMOVE>
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > > Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > > > I had a great Instructor, he was strict and informative.
>>>>>> > > > While doing our bank instruction - up to 60 degs - he
>>>>>> > > > gently admonished that my ball was not centered.
>>>>>> > > > He went on to explain that most pilots bank left to
>>>>>> > > > site see and also in the circuit, so the left tank may
>>>>>> > > > fill up from the right if your uncoordinated and too
>>>>>> > > > lax to coordinate turns while site seeing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > > It sort of depends on the aircraft and its' fuel system.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Of course, Cessna 150/2 herein.
>>>>>> > Ken
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Go out, do a long slip, and report back as to how much
>>>>>> imbalance occurs.
>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>
>>>>> So you advocate SOP in an F104 would be ok
>>>>> with one wing tip tank empty and another one
>>>>> full...The purpose of training is make the new
>>>>> pilot AWARE, they have to become part of the
>>>>> airplane they are flying. That's a vital part of
>>>>> learning how to fly REAL A/C, something you
>>>>> BIG HEAD have very limited experience with.
>>>>>
>>>>> Good thing I'm here to back-stop this operation.
>>>>
>>>> See what I mean? How is one supposed to deal with this level of
>>>> cluelessness? It's monumental.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>>
>>>
>>> Though it's good to know Ken is available as a back-stop if needed
;)
>>>
>>>
>> Do yuo think he's got enough brains to stand still?
>>
>> Bertie
>>>
>>
>
> No, I just thought he probably doesn't have enough brains to move!
>
>
>

I bet his neighbors do..


Bertie

On Mar 4, 1:44 pm, Bertie the Bunyip <A...@AA.AA> wrote:
> buttman <nbvF...@> wrote in news:63d81446-c91c-4b9f-82d8-
> b6b9e54b0...@i12g2000prf..com:
>
> > On Mar 4, 12:37 pm, Dudley Henriques <dhenriq...@rcn.com> wrote:
> >> It's what OTHERS here think of my opinion of you
> >> that might be of some consequence.:-)
>
> >> --
> >> Dudley Henriques
>
> > Ah, that patented Dudley brand of self-importance. Like clockwork.
> > What would we do without it?
>
> Uh oh. he's gotten into Kennie's stash.
>
> bertie

LMAO!! keep them knee slappers comin' bertie (-:

On Mar 4, 7:37 pm, Dudley Henriques <dhenriq...@rcn.com> wrote:
>
> > I've learned plenty.
>
> Now here's an ambiguous comment :-) Am I the bad guy or the good guy in
> this novel? :-))
>
> --
> Dudley Henriques

I don't have affinity for folks named "buttman." Talk about ambiguous.

The only Dudley I ever knew was Do-Right, and as a Mountie, he was a
good chap.

Dan

On Mar 4, 5:30 pm, Dudley Henriques <dhenriq...@rcn.com> wrote:

> Don't flatter yourself. I could care less if you are a CFI or not other
> than establishing that if you are, you're certainly not worth the title.
> If you have the rating, as I seem to see below, this simply verifies
> that the system allowed you through.

You're the one who has been harping on me for the past few months
trying to get me to "prove" I'm really a CFI. I finally do and you
blow it off. Thats basically what I expected.

>
> Your posts attesting to how you handle the rating are more than enough
> for my use. How you profess to be teaching your students is much more
> revealing than whether or not you actually are a CFI.
> Be advised that I intend using your online personna of "Buttman" and
> some of your posting as a negative example other CFI's on how NOT to
> instruct.

You realize I've posted maybe 15 times in my entire 3 year Usenet
career on the subject of flight instructing? I'd LOOOVE to hear your
case against me.

So you're with a CFI applicant. Today is the day where you give him
the "how not to be a CFI" talk. You go over to your computer, load up
Usenet, and begin to show this person all the horrors internet user
Buttman has brought upon the profession. I really don't even care
about specifics, but I'd really like to know what kind of things you'd
say.

Based on your posting here, you'd probably just make some blanket
claims "this guy is a horrible instructor", the try to justify it
solely by the virtue of the fact you have some achievements, rather
than any kind of logic or reasoning, "This is true because I've been
in the industry for 200 years and I've worked with blah blah blah".
I've not read a single thing you've posted here where you've made ANY
attempt to justify your points other than with your signature file.


> I'm sure this means little to you From my email however,it apparently
> means something to others who frequent this forum.

Don't flatter yourself.

buttman wrote:
> On Mar 4, 5:30 pm, Dudley Henriques <dhenriq...@rcn.com> wrote:
>
>> Don't flatter yourself. I could care less if you are a CFI or not other
>> than establishing that if you are, you're certainly not worth the title.
>> If you have the rating, as I seem to see below, this simply verifies
>> that the system allowed you through.
>
> You're the one who has been harping on me for the past few months
> trying to get me to "prove" I'm really a CFI. I finally do and you
> blow it off. Thats basically what I expected.
>
>> Your posts attesting to how you handle the rating are more than enough
>> for my use. How you profess to be teaching your students is much more
>> revealing than whether or not you actually are a CFI.
>> Be advised that I intend using your online personna of "Buttman" and
>> some of your posting as a negative example other CFI's on how NOT to
>> instruct.
>
> You realize I've posted maybe 15 times in my entire 3 year Usenet
> career on the subject of flight instructing? I'd LOOOVE to hear your
> case against me.
>
> So you're with a CFI applicant. Today is the day where you give him
> the "how not to be a CFI" talk. You go over to your computer, load up
> Usenet, and begin to show this person all the horrors internet user
> Buttman has brought upon the profession. I really don't even care
> about specifics, but I'd really like to know what kind of things you'd
> say.
>
> Based on your posting here, you'd probably just make some blanket
> claims "this guy is a horrible instructor", the try to justify it
> solely by the virtue of the fact you have some achievements, rather
> than any kind of logic or reasoning, "This is true because I've been
> in the industry for 200 years and I've worked with blah blah blah".
> I've not read a single thing you've posted here where you've made ANY
> attempt to justify your points other than with your signature file.
>
>
>> I'm sure this means little to you From my email however,it apparently
>> means something to others who frequent this forum.
>
> Don't flatter yourself.

I have nothing against you personally. I don't even know you. You don't
use your actual name and the stage personna you've chosen souns like it
came from a 2 year old.

I just think your approach to flight instruction can use some
"amplification" so to speak. A lot of us spend a great deal of time on
these groups trying to help people learn to fly PROPERLY.
Every now and then someone like yourself comes along and starts posting
here in some "authorative manner". I simply want every student here to
know that for whatever they want to take out of it either way, I for one
don't care for the things you have to say concerning flying and flight
instruction and in fact believe that some of what you profess to do with
students is in my opinion anyway, downright dangerous.
That's all there is to it my friend. Just a vast difference in opinion
between you and me as to how flight instruction should be performed.
How people on the forum take this is strictly up to each individual who
reads what each of us has to say.
Nothing personal at all. I just wouldn't fly with you that's all.



--
Dudley Henriques

Dan wrote:
> On Mar 4, 7:37 pm, Dudley Henriques <dhenriq...@rcn.com> wrote:
>>> I've learned plenty.
>> Now here's an ambiguous comment :-) Am I the bad guy or the good guy in
>> this novel? :-))
>>
>> --
>> Dudley Henriques
>
> I don't have affinity for folks named "buttman." Talk about ambiguous.
>
> The only Dudley I ever knew was Do-Right, and as a Mountie, he was a
> good chap.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
Know that one well. My wife changed it to Dudley Dowrong though :-)

--
Dudley Henriques