Click HERE to return to our International home page
Custom Search
Go Back   TRAVEL.com ® Travel Forums > Outdoor Recreation Forums > Aircraft Owners & Pilots Forum > Soaring & Sailplanes Forum

Notices

Soaring & Sailplanes Forum Fixed-wing non-powered flight: soaring, sailplanes, and gliders forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 22nd January 2007, 10:21 AM   #1 (permalink)
BB
Guest
 
BB's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Classified Rating: % ()
Default Two proposals to explore Dynamic Soaring

The theoretical analyses of this sort of thing I've read point to
somewhat different maneuvers.

First, you don't really want to slow down. The only reason for slowing
down is to expoit a vertical wind shear. If the shear were discrete,
i.e. 30 kts above 1000' and 0 below, then you wouldn't slow down much
at all: you'd do the into wind turn at 1001 feet, 100 kts, and the
downwind turn at 999 feet, 99 kts. You would not pull way back and go
up to 1500 feet at 40 kts.

You gain more energy the faster you're going. Think of a tennis ball
gaining energy by being swatted back and forth between two rackets.
That's what we're doing here. You gain more energy the more massive the
ball, and the faster it goes.

In "real life" the shear is not so discrete. So there's a tradeoff: the
higher you go, the greater the wind difference, but the less energy you
gain since you're going slower. The optimum is not, though, to rise up
to near stall and then dive down. The upwind turn should still be a
high speed, high bank, high g affair.

Second, circles are not optimal. The model airplanes we've seen do this
because they need to stay near the guy with the transmitter. The
optimal path changes course as little as possible. It's more efficient
to do S turns, ideally in a heavily ballasted glider going pretty fast.


Where might we actually use this in real life? My winter day dreaming
has me trying to make an upwind transition on a ridge day, realizing
I'm not going to make it, and then turning sideways, dynamic soaring in
the lee of the upwind ridge, doing S turns parallel to the ridge but
slowly moving upwind, until I gain enough energy to clear the top of
the ridge. We know model airplanes can dynamic soar in the lee of
ridges; we need to find out if the shear is strong enough and well
enough defined a mile or so downwind of the ridge to make this useful
for sailplanes.

If someone gets motivated to try it this winter, let us know. Matt: how
about programming something like this in the simulator, and let's see
if you can pick up enough energy in a 15-20 kt shear over say 500
vertical feet to make progress upwind?

John Cochrane BB

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Share on FacebookGoogle Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Propeller this post!Bookmark to Squidoo!Stumble this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2007, 01:59 PM   #2 (permalink)
BB
Guest
 
BB's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Classified Rating: % ()
Default Two proposals to explore Dynamic Soaring

> One other scenario that might be practical is trying to make it home
> late in the day when the wind is up and the thermals have died or been
> broken up. One might use DS to fly perpendicular to the wind without
> loosing altitude to get to the field.
>
> Matt.


I've thought of this one a bit too. It's most likely to work pretty
late, when the atmosphere has decoupled, i.e. the ground is cooling
fast. The biggest problem for me at least is that you'd need a vast
area of very landable terrain!

John Cochrane

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Share on FacebookGoogle Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Propeller this post!Bookmark to Squidoo!Stumble this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2007, 05:45 AM   #3 (permalink)
Jack
Guest
 
Jack's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Classified Rating: % ()
Default Two proposals to explore Dynamic Soaring

BB wrote:

> I've thought of this one a bit too. It's most likely to work pretty
> late, when the atmosphere has decoupled, i.e. the ground is cooling
> fast. The biggest problem for me at least is that you'd need a vast
> area of very landable terrain!



As in NE IL, for example? ;)


Jack
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Share on FacebookGoogle Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Propeller this post!Bookmark to Squidoo!Stumble this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
dynamic, explore, proposals, soaring

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Edinburgh Haymarket proposals The Real Doctor UK Railway Forum 1 2nd May 2008 05:05 AM
Explore Jack Taylor UK Railway Forum 5 11th February 2007 10:50 AM
BAA Gatwick Express proposals Grumpy Old Man UK Railway Forum 4 18th January 2006 08:21 AM
Explore England Nitin Koshy Europe Travel Forum 3 10th August 2003 10:14 PM
Tuscany - which towns to explore from? Ken Blake Europe Travel Forum 1 10th August 2003 01:53 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 PM.


Our International Sites:  www.travel.com | Australia | Canada | China | France | Germany | Hong Kong | India | Ireland | Italy | Japan | Mexico | Netherlands | New Zealand | Singapore | Spain | United Kingdom
cruise.travel.com | forums.travel.com | forums.travel.com/blogs | forums.travel.com/photos | wiki.travel.com
Copyright © 2008 - Travel Online - All Rights Reserved.
TRAVEL.com ®, St. Louis Online (tm), and Travel Online (tm) are trademarks of Travel Online
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the Travel.com User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
About | Investors | User Agreement | Privacy Policy


Powered by: TRAVEL.com

SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0