Thar She Blows!

On Aug 21, 7:11 pm, Bolwerk <bolw...@> wrote:

> I don't think these doctored photos you're seeing on CNN of massive wind
> turbines on each skyscraper are not exactly accurate.  More likely
> you'll see smaller units that wouldn't be so noticeable, especially on
> newer buildings.

I read that the now nixed upper section of the Freedom Fries Tower was
to have many tiny wind turbines.

"chris.linthomp...@"
> (Now THERE'S an interesting factoid! Where in NYC do I live, if I am a
> LIPA customer?)

Rockaway.

Jimmy

On Aug 22, 11:29 am, JimmyGeldb...@mailinator.com wrote:
> "chris.linthomp...@"
>
> > (Now THERE'S an interesting factoid! Where in NYC do I live, if I am a
> > LIPA customer?)
>
> Rockaway.
>
> Jimmy

Got it in one

Chris

On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:31:44 -0700 (PDT), Anna.Marek6969@
wrote:

>I read that the now nixed upper section of the Freedom Fries Tower was
>to have many tiny wind turbines.

Every now and then you can still see turbo-ventilators on old factory
buildings and warehouses - those things that look like one or two foot
diameter ball-shaped mixer beaters that are wind-powered and exhaust
air from the building. They went out of style when modern HVAC
equipment came along.
--

"Stand Clear of the Closing Doors, Please"

Phil Kane - Beaverton, OR
PNW Beburg MP 28.0 - OE District

"jdoe" <jdoe@> wrote in message
news:tq7ua45nm1r2d10i9fvcsmksvc3urq1okv@...
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:29:13 -0700 (PDT), JimmyGeldburg@mailinator.com
> wrote:
>
>>"chris.linthomp...@"
>>> (Now THERE'S an interesting factoid! Where in NYC do I live, if I am a
>>> LIPA customer?)
>>
>>Rockaway.
>>
>>Jimmy
> I believe parts of brooklyn near coney island is LIPA also


Thats news to me as I've been living in this area almost 26 years.

Anna.Marek6969@ wrote:
> On Aug 21, 7:11 pm, Bolwerk <bolw...@> wrote:
>
>> I don't think these doctored photos you're seeing on CNN of massive wind
>> turbines on each skyscraper are not exactly accurate. More likely
>> you'll see smaller units that wouldn't be so noticeable, especially on
>> newer buildings.
>
> I read that the now nixed upper section of the Freedom Fries Tower was
> to have many tiny wind turbines.

Yeah. It's pretty much a nixed Freedom Tower at this point though. I
think the design is utterly different.

On Aug 22, 9:25 pm, Bolwerk <bolw...@> wrote:
> chris.linthomp...@ wrote:
> > On Aug 22, 11:29 am, JimmyGeldb...@mailinator.com wrote:
> >> "chris.linthomp...@"
>
> >>> (Now THERE'S an interesting factoid! Where in NYC do I live, if I am a
> >>> LIPA customer?)
> >> Rockaway.
>
> >> Jimmy
>
> > Got it in one
>
> Someone beat me to it. :-D
>
> Although, I don't think it's ConEd's or LIPA's business. It's a zoning
> matter, sure, but there's also precedent for ConEd buying residential
> wind power back.

Absolutely. The current sentiment about alternative energy might very
well let me put one up there.

Chris

On Aug 23, 7:42 am, "chris.linthomp...@"
<chris.linthomp...@> wrote:> On Aug 22, 9:25 pm, Bolwerk
<bolw...@> wrote:> > > > > > > chris.linthomp...@
wrote:> > > On Aug 22, 11:29 am, JimmyGeldb...@mailinator.com wrote:>
> >> "chris.linthomp...@"> > > >>> (Now THERE'S an
interesting factoid! Where in NYC do I live, if I am a> > >>> LIPA
customer?)> > >> Rockaway.> > > >> Jimmy> > > > Got it in one> > >
Someone beat me to it.  :-D> > > Although, I don't think it's ConEd's
or LIPA's business.  It's a zoning> > matter, sure, but there's also
precedent for ConEd buying residential> > wind power back.> >
Absolutely. The current sentiment about alternative energy might very>
well let me put one up there.With the proliferation of satellite
dishes like fungi on the side of every building, it's obvious that no
one is concerned about the appearance of accretions on the urban
landscape.

On Aug 23, 11:29 am, ste...@panix.com (Steven M. O'Neill) wrote:
> Peter T. Daniels <gramma...@> wrote:
>
> >On Aug 23, 7:42 am, "chris.linthomp...@"
> ><chris.linthomp...@> wrote:> On Aug 22, 9:25 pm, Bolwerk
> ><bolw...@> wrote:> > > > > > > chris.linthomp...@
> >wrote:> > > On Aug 22, 11:29 am, JimmyGeldb...@mailinator.com wrote:>
> >> >> "chris.linthomp...@"> > > >>> (Now THERE'S an
> >interesting factoid! Where in NYC do I live, if I am a> > >>> LIPA
> >customer?)> > >> Rockaway.> > > >> Jimmy> > > > Got it in one> > >
> >Someone beat me to it.  :-D> > > Although, I don't think it's ConEd's
> >or LIPA's business.  It's a zoning> > matter, sure, but there's also
> >precedent for ConEd buying residential> > wind power back.> >
> >Absolutely. The current sentiment about alternative energy might very>
> >well let me put one up there.With the proliferation of satellite
> >dishes like fungi on the side of every building, it's obvious that no
> >one is concerned about the appearance of accretions on the urban
> >landscape.
>
> Are you intentionally formatting your posts into a big blob so
> that no one will read them?

What do you think?

I've never seen that happen before.

Did Bolwerk get the blobby form and insert Returns, or did he get it
properly?

Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> On Aug 23, 11:29 am, ste...@panix.com (Steven M. O'Neill) wrote:
>> Peter T. Daniels <gramma...@> wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 23, 7:42 am, "chris.linthomp...@"
>>> <chris.linthomp...@> wrote:> On Aug 22, 9:25 pm, Bolwerk
>>> <bolw...@> wrote:> > > > > > > chris.linthomp...@
>>> wrote:> > > On Aug 22, 11:29 am, JimmyGeldb...@mailinator.com wrote:>
>>>>>> "chris.linthomp...@"> > > >>> (Now THERE'S an
>>> interesting factoid! Where in NYC do I live, if I am a> > >>> LIPA
>>> customer?)> > >> Rockaway.> > > >> Jimmy> > > > Got it in one> > >
>>> Someone beat me to it. :-D> > > Although, I don't think it's ConEd's
>>> or LIPA's business. It's a zoning> > matter, sure, but there's also
>>> precedent for ConEd buying residential> > wind power back.> >
>>> Absolutely. The current sentiment about alternative energy might very>
>>> well let me put one up there.With the proliferation of satellite
>>> dishes like fungi on the side of every building, it's obvious that no
>>> one is concerned about the appearance of accretions on the urban
>>> landscape.
>> Are you intentionally formatting your posts into a big blob so
>> that no one will read them?
>
> What do you think?
>
> I've never seen that happen before.
>
> Did Bolwerk get the blobby form and insert Returns, or did he get it
> properly?

I just snipped everything you didn't say. It happened to your 7:34pm
message to Stephen Sprunk too (message id:
<5a323d4f-0aa7-4683-87ba-813e70202903@d1g2000hsg..com>)