Harrah's vs. Planet Hollywood Harrahs has better customer service and comps than PH. But the PH
casino is brand new, and the rooms are nicer. Harrahs is a little old
for my taste. Also, the pool at PH is nicer. The miracle mile mall at
PH is also very cool.
BongCrosby wrote:
> Howdy ~~
>
> Some friends and I are going to Las Vegas in mid-August; we've
> reserved rooms at Harrah's under what I'd consider a pretty decent
> rate of $55 weeknights and $119 weekends.
>
> However, I just recently learned of a deal at Planet Hollywood where
> the weekend price is the same as Harrah's, and the weeknight price is
> $59 instead of $55.
>
> Given that both hotels cost roughly the same, can anyone offer
> opinions as to whether either hotel is significantly better than the
> other? Although my friends and I have been to LV several times in the
> past few years (special shout-out to Mr. Berman, who provided me with
> some excellent information on the Tuscany several years back), we've
> never stayed at either place.
>
> While you can get decent information on both hotels from any number of
> sites, finding information that provides a comparison between the two
> is somewhat harder to find. It *looks* as though Planet Hollywood is
> a bit better than Harrah's, although I'm wondering whether the
> difference is significant enough to merit changing hotels.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks much,
>
> Mike
>
> |