Keane wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:19:07 GMT, "CEO Boom"
> <thisisabadaddresssodontuseit@boom.com> wrote:
>
If it's a must see for
>>>>people, though it will encourage those coming for quick weekends, say
>>>>Friday through Monday, to add one day on to their stays. Maybe that's
>>>>the strategy?
>>>
>>(my addition)
>>Well, Tuesday comes before Thursday, that's for sure !!
Good question--If you had to play to both Orlando locals *and* tourist
audiences, what nights would you pick?
Weekends aren't good for the locals, who already have their own
nightlife, and Wednesdays aren't good for tourists, who like to keep one
weekend in their trips...Seems like Mondays and Thursdays are the only
compromises.
>>Because of the opening of American Idol, DHS has had to re-evaluate the
>>budget. Fantasmic! has been open for 10 years (well almost anyway) and the
>>management decided that it was time to experiment with the schedule a bit.
Oh, and they might try changing the show, while they're at it:
Yes, everyone wants to see the outdoor spectacle of Mickey fighting the
dragon and stuff blowing up, but sitting the show itself is more
Pressler-outdated than the Tiki Room:UNM--
Villain marketing (remember that one?), and long segments devoted to
Hunchback and Pocahontas...
I'm waiting to see that faux-Fantasmic "Wonderful World of Color" show
that DCA is lining up for their 2.0 version, and wondering whether the
Studios can alter their own show to a general Disney-history theme
accordingly.
As it is now, the current Studios version could stand a few less shows
per night. 9_9
>>The theory is that most of the guests that see Fantasmic! today are repeat
>>customers and I guess (sigh) management would rather see them pushing and
>>shoving each other to get another stuffed animal ... Anyway, the theory goes
>>on to say that this move will get more guests back into the restaurants and
>>attractions, allow the park to cut costs by minimizing the staff needed
>>at/after closing time, and keep those union (performer) dollars down to a
>>dull roar.
> So they're taking a lesson from ABC, who learned that reality based
> caca is cheaper than regular programming?
I'm getting the distinct vibe that the Idol attraction was another case
of a company Imagineering their *own* attraction, selling it to the
highest bidder, and Disney getting stuck with it because they were
sucker enough to think it ws a "craze"--
I don't see a long-range future for this one, but for the moment, call
this one Goosebumps II.
> Keane, who just doesn't get reality TV...
Think Albert Brooks said it best (when news was interviewing the "Real
Life" director on the then "Survivor" craze):
"You've got thousands of *non-union* people lining up to be on your
show...You can do ANYTHING YOU WANT to them for six months...And at the
end, you only have to pay *one* of them! :) "
Derek Janssen
ejanss1@