Click HERE to return to our International home page
Custom Search
Go Back   TRAVEL.com ® Travel Forums > Speciality Travel Forums > Disney Theme Parks Forum

Notices

Disney Theme Parks Forum An informative exchange between Disney fans and employees.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 19th January 2007, 12:08 AM   #11 (permalink)
Randy Berbaum
Guest
 
Randy Berbaum's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Classified Rating: % ()
Default Fort Wilderness

Rudeney <rudeney@mickeypics.com> wrote:

: Yeah, when you look at FW from an aerial or satellite view, I notice
: two things. First, I am surprised at how large FW is! I never
: realized there was such demand for camping there. The other thing I
: notice is how much additional land is all around it. I know a lot of
: it is likely swampy, but it looks like there easily three times as much
: undeveloped land as there are existing campsites.

Well, expansion is limited. The sites give the impression that you are
camping in deep forest, but in reality things are very tightly packed.
Expansion (even if the "wetlands" problem went away) is severely limited.
To the north the lake blocks expansion (unless you tent camp in scuba
gear). :) To the east the golf course is there. To the south would have
everyone crossing a very busy road (golf carts would never get across the
road at some times of day without being crunched). So that leaves the
swamp land that covers the entire area from the campground to World drive
and the STOL landing strip. The only place already surrounded by FtW
internal roadways is the circular area I mentioned across the road from
the Settlement transport circle. Now if the wetlands to the west were fair
game the area available for sites could almost double.

BTW, your idea of puting trailer loops (or cabins) to the south side of
the road could work if one or more bridges spanning over the road and past
the parking lot (which is also unsafe at some times) to allow cart and
pedestrian traffic safe passage. I would even go so far as to say that
this would be a great place to put the cabins. From what I can tell, that
area is not wetland (it was rumored to be the planned site of "Buffalo
Junction") and could be used. There is about a 1 mile by half mile area
that could be used before running into the Epcot area. But it would
require the bridges I mentioned before. Actually, come to think of it if
the campground extended all the way to Epcot Dr, and a pedestrian
passthrough (bridge, underpass, protected sidewalk, etc) was provided, it
might add a real nice exercise path for those of us who might want to walk
to Epcot from time to time. :) Just think of it, a continuous walkway from
Bay lake all the way to Epcot, through Epcot, around Crecent lake and all
the way to the front gate of the Studios. Talk about exercise. :)

Enough wishful thinking.

Randy

==========
Randy Berbaum
Champaign, IL

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Share on FacebookGoogle Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Propeller this post!Bookmark to Squidoo!Stumble this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2007, 05:27 PM   #12 (permalink)
clkelley564
Guest
 
clkelley564's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Classified Rating: % ()
Default Fort Wilderness



>
> IMHO a logical place to expand is to put 3 or 4 loops in the area between
> the Creekside Meadows group camping and the Settlement. These loops would
> be right next to the Settlement (and thus prime realestate for "preferred
> loop" status). And with the new loops starting from scratch they could
> design the sites specificly to accomodate the larger motorhomes and long
> term stays. And this would leave more sites available for the rest of us.
>
> JMHO
>
> Randy
>
> ==========
> Randy Berbaum
> Champaign, IL


I would love it if it they were to expand in that area. Then it would
be "legal" to take that road over to the exercise trail from 2000 to
get to the Settlement. :-)

Carol

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Share on FacebookGoogle Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Propeller this post!Bookmark to Squidoo!Stumble this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
fort, wilderness

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fort Wilderness to EPCOT Princess Buttercup aka Ginny Favers Former Captive Princess of Chickapin Hill Disney Theme Parks Forum 1 11th July 2007 06:52 PM
Fort Wilderness Report Peteygold Disney Theme Parks Forum 1 28th February 2007 10:27 AM
Fort Wilderness/Wilderness Walk with Photos, Part I up Peteygold Disney Theme Parks Forum 1 23rd February 2007 11:32 PM
Fort Wilderness Concerns deb Disney Theme Parks Forum 6 21st August 2006 10:23 PM
Fort Wilderness JerryD\(upstateNY\) Disney Theme Parks Forum 8 25th October 2005 06:39 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 AM.


Our International Sites:  www.travel.com | Australia | Canada | China | France | Germany | Hong Kong | India | Ireland | Italy | Japan | Mexico | Netherlands | New Zealand | Singapore | Spain | United Kingdom
cruise.travel.com | forums.travel.com | forums.travel.com/blogs | forums.travel.com/photos | wiki.travel.com
Copyright © 2008 - Travel Online - All Rights Reserved.
TRAVEL.com ®, St. Louis Online (tm), and Travel Online (tm) are trademarks of Travel Online
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the Travel.com User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
About | Investors | User Agreement | Privacy Policy


Powered by: TRAVEL.com

SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0