Safer at sea than on land

Thus spake "John Sisker" <jsisker@> :

>To Whom It May Concern:
>
>We came across this information in the trades and thought it would be of
>interest to this newsgroup as well. If this is somehow a repeat of an
>earlier post, sorry we missed it. This can always be ignored or deleted.
>
>
Four days old & cold.

--
dillon

Could have been is in the past
Could be is in the future
There is only the now

But John beat Steinbrenner to the "negative" news by six hours.
--
DG in Cherry Hill, NJ

"Dillon Pyron" <dmpyronINVALID@austin.> wrote in message
news:61jr02prkp9h14fjiq3of99km1suc79j61@...
> Thus spake "John Sisker" <jsisker@> :
>
>>To Whom It May Concern:
>>
>>We came across this information in the trades and thought it would be of
>>interest to this newsgroup as well. If this is somehow a repeat of an
>>earlier post, sorry we missed it. This can always be ignored or deleted.
>>
>>
> Four days old & cold.
>
> --
> dillon
>
> Could have been is in the past
> Could be is in the future
> There is only the now

Dillon Pyron wrote:
> Thus spake "John Sisker" <jsisker@> :
>
>> To Whom It May Concern:
>>
>> We came across this information in the trades and thought it would be of
>> interest to this newsgroup as well. If this is somehow a repeat of an
>> earlier post, sorry we missed it. This can always be ignored or deleted.
>>
>>
> Four days old & cold.
>
Do you have a program to calculate how old the news is???
To me, his postings are better then Ray's. At least his sig lines are at
the end...

"John Sisker" <jsisker@> wrote in message
news:uaCPf.8457$S25.6242@newsread1.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
> "Cruising is one of the safest vacations available," according to the
> International Council of Cruise Lines, is Negative news? I guess it all
> prospective by some. Likewise, others are apparently into counting... this
> is "two days old", this is "four days old and cold!" That's all well and
> good if they have that kind of time on their hands, but as I said... "if
> this is somehow a repeat of an earlier post, sorry we missed it. This can
> always be ignored or deleted." Seemingly, that's the only part that is
> being ignored. And true to form, nothing is ever said when my information
> just happens to be the first time posted, just when it apparently isn't.
>
> And yes, my sig information is at the bottom of my posts, as required by
> the guidelines of this newsgroup. At least, I'm trying to follow the
> procedures.


John, you are not getting it..First you started here giving incorrect
information, then you started bombarding the group with outdated material
that had already been posted days ago..and forget the, *if this is a repeat
of an earlier post, sorry, we missed it.* That doesn't cut it...Do some
research before you post...Then you give a very negative report about a ship
that someone here is excited about taking..I don't see any other T/As doing
that..You can give a negative opinion without dredging up something that
happened years ago; that is not as explicit and detrimental and applies or
has applied to other cruise ships as well. You are posting to many veteran
cruisers here as well as newbies, who should be getting correct information
to make the right decisions about cruising.
Sorry, but I feel that you are trying too hard and not checking your
information before putting it into print as fact that can be trusted. You
might think about this before you post. I'm only trying to tell you how I
feel about your posts and not to be hurtful.

--Jean

In article <H4ednaKL_rg23JLZRVn-pw@>, G
<dickdotgoldhaber@gmaildotcom> wrote:

> What we now have are multiple posts of the same information, by Ray and John
> and now by Eric, who is promoting his website.
>
> The result, to our detriment, is an overabundance of information, and maybe
> it is time to call a halt to the posting of news stories from the "Gardenia
> Gazette" or the "Hong Kong Herald".

Eric and John don't even look to see if the information has already
been posted. When you read their posts it is evident that both John and
Eric are meatheads.

Ray has been posting info in a timely manner for years. Besides the
info posts, Ray has made intelligent contributions to the discussions.
Ray is not a meathead. I'll stick with Ray.

> No mas, people.

If you don't want to read their posts use your kill file.

--
Charles

Charles wrote:

> Ray has been posting info in a timely manner for years. Besides the
> info posts, Ray has made intelligent contributions to the discussions.
> Ray is not a meathead. I'll stick with Ray.
>

Ray does contribute but I also remember he googled someone to dig up
their background just because that person's view is diff from him.

>
> If you don't want to read their posts use your kill file.
>
Best advice.