2 Texas cruises diverted to New Orleans

John Sisker wrote:

> Carnival is uncertain when its ships will be able to dock at Galveston
> again.

This is true!

But de la Cruz said the cruise line also is trying to make
> arrangements to tie up at the nearby Port of Houston.

John, you are a little behind here!!

Go read Ray's press release that was posted Yesterday, 9/17/08 at
1:24PM. Seems that Carnival already has made arrangements to dock in
Houston and announced their plans.

sue

I goofed with the date, it was posted as I mentioned below, but on the
16th not the 17th.

sue

John Sisker wrote:
> Sue,
>
> Actually, today is 9/17/08, yesterday was the 16th. Yet, in either case,
> I can find Ray's post that you talk of. However, thanks for the update
> anyway.
>

>
>
> "Sue Mullen" <kjmullen@> wrote in message
> news:6jctneF2ndd8U1@mid....
>>
>> John Sisker wrote:
>>
>>> Carnival is uncertain when its ships will be able to dock at
>>> Galveston again.
>>
>> This is true!
>>
>> But de la Cruz said the cruise line also is trying to make
>>> arrangements to tie up at the nearby Port of Houston.
>>
>> John, you are a little behind here!!
>>
>> Go read Ray's press release that was posted Yesterday, 9/17/08 at
>> 1:24PM. Seems that Carnival already has made arrangements to dock in
>> Houston and announced their plans.
>>
>> sue
>

John Sisker wrote:

> I was just curious just how far others would actually
> pursue this line of dialogue just to prove a totally useless point of
> "who said it first?" Who cares!

John, as usual you just don't get the point. It had nothing to do with
"who posted it first", it was that your information was no longer the
correct when you posted that Carnival was "trying" to make arrangements.

sue

John Sisker wrote:
> Carnival/Galveston?............dialogue just to prove a totally useless point of
> "who said it first?" Who cares!
>
>
>
You do or you would not have responded AGAIN.

"Sue Mullen" <kjmullen@> wrote in message
news:6jgpngF37nh0U1@mid....
>
>
> John Sisker wrote:
>
>> I was just curious just how far others would actually pursue this line of
>> dialogue just to prove a totally useless point of "who said it first?"
>> Who cares!
>
> John, as usual you just don't get the point. It had nothing to do with
> "who posted it first", it was that your information was no longer the
> correct when you posted that Carnival was "trying" to make arrangements.
>
> sue

But also, by he and Ray replying to each other several times, they each get
to post their sig's a few extra times. And isn't that really the whole
point?

Suzie, go sit on Ray's face...



"Sue Mullen" <kjmullen@> wrote in message
news:6jgpngF37nh0U1@mid....
>
>
> John Sisker wrote:
>
>> I was just curious just how far others would actually pursue this line of
>> dialogue just to prove a totally useless point of "who said it first?"
>> Who cares!
>
> John, as usual you just don't get the point. It had nothing to do with
> "who posted it first", it was that your information was no longer the
> correct when you posted that Carnival was "trying" to make arrangements.
>
> sue