Caribbean travel is dangerous !

There are dangerous pirates everywhere , they will kill the women,
rape the men and steal the animals onboard, I tell you !

Yes, it's dangerous !

It is more like kill the men, steal the fish and boat.

"Tom-Alex Soorhull" <nice_snipper.nz> wrote in message
news:536e17d9.0405160038.2d318d17@c om...
> There are dangerous pirates everywhere , they will kill the women,
> rape the men and steal the animals onboard, I tell you !
>
> Yes, it's dangerous !

In article <536e17d9.0405160038.2d318d17@com >,
nice_snipper.nz (Tom-Alex Soorhull) wrote:
>There are dangerous pirates everywhere , they will kill the women,
>rape the men and steal the animals onboard, I tell you !
>
>Yes, it's dangerous !
I keep forgetting is it rape THEN pillage or the other way around. I don't
want to get on the wrong side of the Pirate's Union.

--------------------------------------------------------
"Writers even write the silences"
-J. Michael Straczynski

On 16 May 2004 01:38:47 -0700, nice_snipper.nz (Tom-Alex
Soorhull) wrote:

>There are dangerous pirates everywhere , they will kill the women,

<yawn>

>rape the men

Oh, good. Homosexual pirates, that's what we need.

>and steal the animals onboard, I tell you !

LEAVE THE KITTENS ALONE!

On Sun, 16 May 2004 15:08:06 GMT, kurtullmanm (Kurt Ullman)
wrote:

> So many rules and regulations. I can remember how it was before the
>government got involved when all you needed to was a ship and a parrot. Now,
>you have to have specific non-slide stoppers on the bottom of your peg leg, a
>safety guard on the hook, the Coast Guard has to inspect the ship, ATF is
>making us keep up paperwork on the cannon, the Humane Society has to make sure
>you aren't keeping the parrot on your shoulder for more than 5 hours at a time
>and that they have two breaks a shift. I tell ya, being a pirate ain't as fun
>as it used to be.

One word.

SOLAS

"Jim Johnson" <Jim_Johnson@BigText.com> wrote in message
news:kYidnT2-xNfkCOfcRVn-gw@fcc.net...

>
> Hey Granny,
> I don't give a FLYING .. world hunger is a "WORLD" problem.. not a
> USA problem..

Isn`t that a typical way of the american way of thinking?
To give a about all others than yourself?

Leif Arild

"Petal and Leif" <lejensen@online.no> wrote in message
news:Mnyed.3384$Km6.80996@news4.e.nsc.no...
>
> "Jim Johnson" <Jim_Johnson@BigText.com> wrote in message
> news:kYidnT2-xNfkCOfcRVn-gw@fcc.net...
>
> >
> > Hey Granny,
> > I don't give a FLYING .. world hunger is a "WORLD" problem.. not
a
> > USA problem..
>
> Isn`t that a typical way of the american way of thinking?
> To give a about all others than yourself?
>
> Leif Arild
>

Actually that is Jim Johnson's way of thinking. Rather presumptive of you
to believe that all Americans share his selfish narrow minded opinions.

"Rosalie B." <gmbeasley@> wrote in message
news:ohuln05olgb0kt7tlrfme098uvgncug4fm@...
> "Petal and Leif" <lejensen@online.no> wrote:
>
> In think that basically everyone cares the most about their own
> interests with the exception of maybe someone like Mother Theresa.
> Americans have no monopoly on this.

Mother Theresa's "help" was conditional on accepting the Roman Catholic view
on contraception, thereby forcing many to continue having children they
could not support and compounding the problem.

Regards

Jim wrote:

> If you believe that then you are a complete fool.

I'll tell you what's foolish.

Here's an analogy.

The approach the US is taking on the "war on terror(tm)" is as if
suddenly the brakes on cars stopped working and you decided that the
fix is to install padded guard rails everywhere instead of figuring
out why the brakes aren't working.

Instead of trying to understand why people thousands of miles away
become suicidal activists you instead create fortress America and
battleship America. Doing that might make you feel good in the short
term, but it will lead to the erosion of your own civil rights as you
slowly become a police state consumed with issues of security. Do you
want to have to pass through a metal detector every time you walk
through your front door every morning? It's coming to that...

(and no - you weren't attacked because of your rich and decadent
life-style. If that were the case the terrorists would have flown
their planes into down-town Amsterdam).

Donald Rumsfeld <Squinty@pentegon.com> wrote:

>Here's an analogy.
>
>The approach the US is taking on the "war on terror(tm)" is as if
>suddenly the brakes on cars stopped working and you decided that the
>fix is to install padded guard rails everywhere instead of figuring
>out why the brakes aren't working.

Not quite. It's more like blasting everything else off the road
so you don't crash into anything as you career along on two wheels.

--
Ken Tough