Click HERE to return to our International home page
Custom Search

Go Back   TRAVEL.com ® Travel Forums > World Regions > Australia & New Zealand Travel Forum > Australia Railway Forum

Notices

Australia Railway Forum Getting about Australia and its metro areas by rail.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 6th May 2008, 05:19 PM   #1 (permalink)
David Bennetts
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Classified Rating: % ()
Default Metro throws Sydney's big plan on its head

Where does that ridiculous 4000 passengers per hour figure come from? An
eight car double deck set can carry up to 2000 passengers (provided they're
not all sumo wrestlers) so that means just one train every half hour in
peak.


Regards

David Bennetts


 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Share on FacebookGoogle Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Propeller this post!Bookmark to Squidoo!Stumble this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2008, 03:30 AM   #2 (permalink)
Bill Bolton
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Classified Rating: % ()
Default Metro throws Sydney's big plan on its head

Matthew Geier <matthew@no.sleeper.no.apana.no.org.no.au> wrote:

> Well the obvious thing is to refit the Epping-Chatswood line to run a
> high density 'metro' service


All that does is move most of the problem to Chatswood instead of
Epping. <rolls eyes>

Bill Bolton
Sydney, Australia
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Share on FacebookGoogle Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Propeller this post!Bookmark to Squidoo!Stumble this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2008, 03:51 AM   #3 (permalink)
Steven Saunderson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Classified Rating: % ()
Default Metro throws Sydney's big plan on its head

On Wed, 07 May 2008 18:30:41 +1000, Bill Bolton
<billbolton@computer.org> wrote:

> Matthew Geier <matthew@no.sleeper.no.apana.no.org.no.au> wrote:
>
> > Well the obvious thing is to refit the Epping-Chatswood line to run a
> > high density 'metro' service

>
> All that does is move most of the problem to Chatswood instead of
> Epping.


Also it would reduce the number of trains running south from Chatswood.
I'm assuming that trains from North Ryde will continue to the city. If
not, we're going to have awfully packed trains on the lower shore and we
might even get close to this theoretical load of 2000 people per train
(I really can't imagine cramming 250 folk into each carraige).
--
Steven
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Share on FacebookGoogle Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Propeller this post!Bookmark to Squidoo!Stumble this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2008, 03:41 AM   #4 (permalink)
Somebody in the WWW
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Classified Rating: % ()
Default Metro throws Sydney's big plan on its head

On May 8, 7:53 am, C. Dewick <cra...@lios.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> It's not like there is any industrial rail connection to Kurnell. The area
> would certainly benefit from that but could you see the local residents
> agreeing to an industrial branch line coming off the Cronulla like somewhere
> just after the Gannons Road overbridge, running around the permiter of the
> golf course, then following Captain Cook Drive all the way out to to
> Kurnell! Great idea (like the railway to Jervis Bay) but hard to see it
> ever happening. 8-)


Have you tried asking your bosses at Independant Rail if they will
consider it? ;)

Oh wait, is that RailCorp now?
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Share on FacebookGoogle Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Propeller this post!Bookmark to Squidoo!Stumble this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2008, 08:32 AM   #5 (permalink)
bob.another
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Classified Rating: % ()
Default Metro throws Sydney's big plan on its head

On May 8, 6:41 pm, Somebody in the WWW <microch...@**********> wrote:
> On May 8, 7:53 am, C. Dewick <cra...@lios.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
>
>
> > It's not like there is any industrial rail connection to Kurnell. The area
> > would certainly benefit from that but could you see the local residents
> > agreeing to an industrial branch line coming off the Cronulla like somewhere
> > just after the Gannons Road overbridge, running around the permiter of the
> > golf course, then following Captain Cook Drive all the way out to to
> > Kurnell! Great idea (like the railway to Jervis Bay) but hard to see it
> > ever happening. 8-)

>
> Have you tried asking your bosses at Independant Rail if they will
> consider it? ;)
>
> Oh wait, is that RailCorp now?


Has he been sacked again?
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Share on FacebookGoogle Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Propeller this post!Bookmark to Squidoo!Stumble this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2008, 12:13 AM   #6 (permalink)
Somebody in the WWW
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Classified Rating: % ()
Default Metro throws Sydney's big plan on its head

On May 9, 4:43 am, C. Dewick <cra...@lios.apana.org.au> wrote:
> Err, no.


Why not? Could be a lot of profit to be made ;)
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Share on FacebookGoogle Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Propeller this post!Bookmark to Squidoo!Stumble this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2008, 03:34 PM   #7 (permalink)
Matthew Geier
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Classified Rating: % ()
Default Metro throws Sydney's big plan on its head

On Sun, 11 May 2008 03:26:31 +0000, Chris Bell wrote:


> When I was there, there were doors at each
> pair of seats, so loading was quick. Not sure about current design of
> trains.


Not any more. The trains that had lots of doors were the old 'slam door'
stock that have all been withdrawn. All suburban services are now by
trains with only two sets of doors a side.
Their passenger growth has been such that operators are now taking seats
out to increase standing room. (Converting 2 x 3 to 2 x 2 mainly). The
only 'upgrades' they are getting to increase capacity are to increase
train lengths to 12 cars where they are not already 12 cars.
New tracks are too expensive and their infrastructure too constrained to
run double decked stock, so they fiddle at the edges.

There seems to me much the same allergy to spending on infrastructure
that NSW has.


 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Share on FacebookGoogle Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Propeller this post!Bookmark to Squidoo!Stumble this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
head, metro, plan, sydney, throws

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Carnival misses port... throws family off ship iuki Cruise Forum 11 20th April 2008 10:04 AM
Slow rail contributing to Sydney's population squeeze intheshanty Australia Railway Forum 2 5th March 2007 05:32 AM
HEAD, for boat with no HEAD. Wag Bag question .. Keith Hughes Yacht Cruising Forum 3 15th February 2007 05:27 PM
Sue's Hilton Head DVC Trip - Plan beth2 Disney Theme Parks Forum 1 10th April 2005 08:56 AM
How is Sydney's drinking water supply purified? fancy nospam tunes Australia & New Zealand Travel Forum 2 10th April 2005 05:28 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 PM.


Our International Sites:  www.travel.com | Australia | Canada | China | France | Germany | Hong Kong | India | Ireland | Italy | Japan | Mexico | Netherlands | New Zealand | Singapore | Spain | United Kingdom
cruise.travel.com | forums.travel.com | forums.travel.com/photos | wiki.travel.com
Copyright © 2008 - Travel Online - All Rights Reserved.
TRAVEL.com ®, St. Louis Online (tm), and Travel Online (tm) are trademarks of Travel Online
About | Contact | Disclaimer | Investors | Privacy Statement


Powered by: TRAVEL.com

SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0