 QR missed connections
Eddie Oliver <eoliver@efs.mq.edu.au> wrote in message news:<3F1914FC.A390B94F@efs.mq.edu.au>...
> John Coyle wrote
>
> [usual repetitious one-track-mindedness]
>
> John, didn't you promise us a week or so ago that you would not raise
> this matter again in this newsgroup?
>
> Is that an indication of the reliability of your promises, or just of
> the shortness of your memory?
Eddie I agreed to drop the issue of the QR working timetable having
incorrect times in it, for the "Inlander".
As it turns out Eddie, I will pursue the issue of QR having long
distance trains miss each other by a matter of minutes, at other
forums, and not via rail.
You can now put on your other hat, as a reasonable member of my Yahoo
Group, and discuss issues raised in that group.
As for discussion boards, there are a couple of other boards that
treat people with respect. This board has become a place for people to
abuse each other, and not for genuine discussion of rail issues.
If you think that it is OK for QR to time their trains to miss each
other, that would indicate that you never intend to use those trains,
or you would be happy to spend the money and time required, stopping
overnight in places such as Townsville or Rockhampton, awaiting onward
train connections.
Right?
John Coyle
| 
