Sjoerd's work - legal?

Tarapia Tapioco <comesefosse@ntani.firenze.linux.it> wrote:

> Well that is the standard Sjoerd nasty reply, but it was a valid question,
> and one that has been asked before but which he always refuses to answer.
> What we can infer from that is that Sjoerd's work involves either illegal
> business, or some borderline-legal business which involves exploiting third
> world peoples.

This sounds as a completely unmotivated deduction. He could as well be,
for example, a UN or NGO worker doing relief work.

E la supercazzola tu gliela fai alla tu' mamma, bischero.

alohacyberian <alohacyberian@att.net> wrote:

> > This sounds as a completely unmotivated deduction. He could as well be,
> > for example, a UN or NGO worker doing relief work.
> >
>
> If that were the case, why wouldn't he admit it?


Who are you, that anybody should report their occupation and their
personal data to you? Are you everybody's judge? Is it your business?
No, it isn't.


--
Luca Logi - Firenze - Italy e-mail: llogi@dada.it

"alohacyberian" <alohacyberian@att.net> wrote:

>"Luca Logi" <llogi@dada.it> wrote in message
>news:1fy12hw.1j8q5qcrvtmnaN%llogi@dada.it...
>> Tarapia Tapioco <comesefosse@ntani.firenze.linux.it> wrote:
>>
>> > Well that is the standard Sjoerd nasty reply, but it was a valid
>question,
>> > and one that has been asked before but which he always refuses to answer.
>> > What we can infer from that is that Sjoerd's work involves either illegal
>> > business, or some borderline-legal business which involves exploiting
>third
>> > world peoples.
>>
>> This sounds as a completely unmotivated deduction. He could as well be,
>> for example, a UN or NGO worker doing relief work.
>>
>
>If that were the case, why wouldn't he admit it?
>
There is no obligation to give personal information to strangers on
usenet. Most people who participate in r.t.e. say little or nothing
about themselves, except as travellers.

PB

sgwennodd "alohacyberian" <alohacyberian@att.net> gachu yn neges
news:Pk9Qa.52659$0v4.3573911@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> "Luca Logi" <llogi@dada.it> wrote in message
<toriad>
> > This sounds as a completely unmotivated deduction. He could as well be,
> > for example, a UN or NGO worker doing relief work.
> >
> If that were the case, why wouldn't he admit it? Because that's not the
> case. Your scenario is nothing to be ashamed of. Or do you do the same
> thing, so you feel compelled to run interference to help him cover the
truth?

As a first step in proving you've got nothing to hide, I suggest that you
post your home address and phone number here...

hwyl!
geraint.

"geraint" wrote

>As a first step in proving you've got nothing to hide, I suggest that you
>post your home address and phone number here... hwyl! geraint.

A lle yn y byd ycych chi?

"geraint" wrote

>As a first step in proving you've got nothing to hide, I suggest that you
>post your home address and phone number here... hwyl! geraint.

A lle yn y byd ycych chi?

sgwennodd "alohacyberian" <alohacyberian@att.net> fwy fyth o gach yn neges
news:E9uQa.53705$3o3.3628141@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
<toriad>
> Gladly, just as soon as you follow your own advice. KM
Hello? Anybody home?
Or have you been kidnapped by a bunch of commies?

hwyl!
geraint.

I don't think our friend alohacyberian would notice the difference.

He obviously believed whatever came out of both their mouths.

John L

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 03:44:37 GMT, carole@caroleallen.com (Carole
Allen) wrote:

>Charlie McCarthy was a wooden doll.
>
>Joseph McCarthy was the raging anti-commie politico


>On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 07:49:00 GMT, "alohacyberian"
><alohacyberian@att.net> wrote:
>
>>LOL! I'm surprised you're old enough to remember Charlie McCarthy, but,
>>obviously you haven't been to my website, though I feel quite certain you'd
>>rather live in your preconceived fantasy than know the truth. Typical of the
>>Left. KM
>>--
>