Does Lycoming make any sense? That is for a different kind of injection system, used by Continental but
not by Lycoming. Lycoming uses RSA which does not have a return-to-tank.
At least it used to be that way.
"jim" <jfleisc@> wrote in message
news:1161386366.903714.60180@e3g2000cwe. ps.com...
> If I remember my "mechanical fuel injection 101" there is a "relief
> port" of sorts somewhere. The pump delivers enough for the injectors
> and then some. The "relief port" orifice bleeds off the excess and
> returns it to the tank or the input side of the pump. Different size
> ports changes the fuel delivery for different size engines. If it gets
> clogged I would think the pump would deliver way too much fuel. Your
> system, however, may not be like that. Just a guess.
>
> Jim
>
>
> On Oct 20, 4:58 pm, "Robert M. Gary" <N70...@> wrote:
>> I just spoke with Lycoming regarding my very high fuel flow. Recently
>> I've had a problem where I'm getting almost double my normal fuel flow
>> at idle even with the mixture at the edge of cut-off. I suspected a
>> servo but called Lycoming. They said I may have a nozzel with a
>> blockage and the other nozzles are streaming because of it.
>> Does this make any sense? Could a blockage cause an *INCREASE* in fuel
>> flow?
>> I have a JPI fuel transducor wheel that measures fuel flow that has
>> shown to be very accurate.
>>
>> -Robert
> |