Cessna 152

Russell Kent wrote:
>
> Two seems a rather skimpy sample, but then I suppose you wouldn't really want her to renew the sampling... :-)

Well, that's two *husbands*. That doesn't count the guys she thought weren't
worth keeping.

George Patterson
If you're not part of the solution, you can make a lot of money prolonging
the problem.

"G.R. Patterson III" <grpphoto@> wrote in message
news:3FB44AD0.AC20FCB9@...
>
>
> Russell Kent wrote:
> >
> > Two seems a rather skimpy sample, but then I suppose you wouldn't really
want her to renew the sampling... :-)
>
> Well, that's two *husbands*. That doesn't count the guys she thought
weren't
> worth keeping.
>
> George Patterson

George, you are definitely the "master of the analogy" :~)

"G.R. Patterson III" <grpphoto@> wrote in message news:3FB44AD0.AC20FCB9@...
>
>
> Russell Kent wrote:
> >
> > Two seems a rather skimpy sample, but then I suppose you wouldn't really want her to renew the sampling... :-)
>
> Well, that's two *husbands*. That doesn't count the guys she thought weren't
> worth keeping.
>
Some are more trouble than others.

Ron Natalie wrote:
>
> Some are more trouble than others.

Yeah, but you're the keeper as far as she's concerned.

George Patterson
If you're not part of the solution, you can make a lot of money prolonging
the problem.