Questions about guns

extrapolated from data available...


>
> It's even more humane not to kill them at all. Do they not have
> foodshops in the US & Canada?
>

If you've ever seen the slaughter of chickens, it's certainly crueler than
shotgunning duck, geese or turkey. As for beef, pork and lamb, better you
shouldn't know. Worst of all are the poor fish, suffocated slowly in a
barrel of ice. What must an oyster feel, day's a'dying?

Shucks, the old .30 WinMag's a blessing in comparison.

TMO

On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:09:35 -0500, Olivers <olive@LOSETHIScalpha.com>
wrote:

> extrapolated from data available...
>
>
>>
>> It's even more humane not to kill them at all. Do they not have
>> foodshops in the US & Canada?
>>
>
>If you've ever seen the slaughter of chickens, it's certainly crueler than
>shotgunning duck, geese or turkey. As for beef, pork and lamb, better you
>shouldn't know. Worst of all are the poor fish, suffocated slowly in a
>barrel of ice. What must an oyster feel, day's a'dying?
>
>Shucks, the old .30 WinMag's a blessing in comparison.
>
>TMO

The hunters just want to kill living things.

They don't need to hunt to get food.

They don't even hunt in a sporting manner.

They use dogs to tree bears and shoot them in the trees.

I wonder if they eat the bear meat.

"Really Me" <reallyme@> wrote in message
news:la0Qc.333$4z5.22@newssvr27.news... .
> Mike O'sullivan wrote:
>
> > "Really Me" <reallyme@> wrote in message
> > news:M5XPc.33$Eq2.12@newssvr27.news....
> >
> >>Bob Chipeska wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>><lysander@uk2.net> wrote in message
> >>>news:ri30h0lc0selp37me1trfrhp4aimtdk5be@ ...
> >>>
> >>>It's so much more humane and sporting to chase down and kill foxes with
> >>>vicious dogs trained by their horsebound owners.
> >>>
> >>>US and Canadian hunters typically eat their kill. Do Brits consume fox
> >
> > meat?
> >
> > No, they're vermin
> >
> >
> >>It depends on the skill of the dog.
> >>If the dog doesn't get them the fox, then they end up consuming dog
meat.
> >
> >
> > Hound, not dog!
> >
>
> Not Hound Dog?

I'll ask Elvis (he just walked by).

>
> I wonder if they eat the bear meat.

Actually bear meat is very tasty - I had some in Helsinki once.

Olivers <olive@LOSETHIScalpha.com> wrote in message news:<Xns953BA53687E3Eolive@216.196.97.142>...
> extrapolated from data available...
>
>
> >
> > It's even more humane not to kill them at all. Do they not have
> > foodshops in the US & Canada?
> >
>
> If you've ever seen the slaughter of chickens, it's certainly crueler than
> shotgunning duck, geese or turkey. As for beef, pork and lamb, better you
> shouldn't know.
[snip]

Actually, these days, commercially (is that enough qualifiers ;-)
beef, pork, and lamb is mercifully simple. A thick, long rod straight
through the brain at high speed. The animal is dead before they
know anything hit them. Now in the OLDEN days.....

On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:56:20 -0500, Olivers <olive@LOSETHIScalpha.com>
wrote:

>john extrapolated from data available...
>
>
>>
>> So to summarize youtr rambling, hunting is killing for pleasure.
>>
>yes, therefore as laudable than killing as duty or as employment.


Thank you, Ollie, for your candor.

"john" <z2345678998765432y@> wrote in message
news:7i6lh09rl07sv46r3bo0uodonmdbabe1k6@...
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:56:20 -0500, Olivers <olive@LOSETHIScalpha.com>
> wrote:
>
> >john extrapolated from data available...
> >
> >
> >>
> >> So to summarize youtr rambling, hunting is killing for pleasure.
> >>
> >yes, therefore as laudable than killing as duty or as employment.
>
>
> Thank you, Ollie, for your candor.

D'you think he stops at animals?

On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 07:51:38 +0000 (UTC), "Mike O'sullivan"
<mike.osullivan3@nowhere.com> wrote:

>
>"john" <z2345678998765432y@> wrote in message
>news:7i6lh09rl07sv46r3bo0uodonmdbabe1k6@.. .
>> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:56:20 -0500, Olivers <olive@LOSETHIScalpha.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >john extrapolated from data available...
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> So to summarize youtr rambling, hunting is killing for pleasure.
>> >>
>> >yes, therefore as laudable than killing as duty or as employment.
>>
>>
>> Thank you, Ollie, for your candor.
>
>D'you think he stops at animals?
>


Not really, Mike