 |
3rd July 2003, 07:29 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Guest | JetBlue adds more legroom, cuts capacity
"KEITH CRABILL" <pizzaman123_6@> wrote in message
news:8049-3F04B39D-232@storefull-2271.public.lawson....
> r there different series of the a320.cause the one midway airlines had
> only had a capacity of holding 148 passengers and 5 crew members.
Yes. In order of increasing size they are: A318, A319, A320, and A321. | |
| |
3rd July 2003, 09:47 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Guest | JetBlue adds more legroom, cuts capacity oh ok ty for the iinfo learn something new everyday.is there a website i
can look up. | |
| |
4th July 2003, 03:50 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Guest | JetBlue adds more legroom, cuts capacity Miguel Cruz wrote:
>
> trice <trice532m> wrote:
> > Since they don't serve meals any longer, maybe he won't need that
> > additional FA you are concerned about. Is there some airline Contract
> > of Carriage rule which states he must have so many FAs for so many
> > passengers?
>
> The official purpose of flight attendants is to ensure passenger safety.
> They are required by law, and in specific numbers (at least minimums).
That's what the ugly ones like to tell you. | |
| |
4th July 2003, 05:11 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Guest | JetBlue adds more legroom, cuts capacity
"trice" <trice532m> wrote in message
news:214884ba.0307041108.5afa7144@c om...
> Since they don't serve meals any longer, maybe he won't need that
> additional FA you are concerned about. Is there some airline Contract
> of Carriage rule which states he must have so many FAs for so many
> passengers?
The FAA tells him the minimum number of FAs. It is something like one per
50 seats or fraction thereof.
Seats FAs
1 to 50 1
51 to 100 2
101 to 150 3
151 to 200 4
etc.
I may be in error by one at the break-points.
In any case, the requirement is Federal and doesn't care whether the seats
are occupied or not. It would seem to be an operational nightmare if the
staffing depended on how many no-shows or walk-ups there were (ie: # of
seats actually occupied). | |
| |
5th July 2003, 08:06 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Guest | JetBlue adds more legroom, cuts capacity Lou Minatti wrote:
>
> This is great for the traveler, but I can't help but think of a
> similar announcement made by American a few years ago. I don't
> believe this will last very long.
If you are referring to American's decision to revert to tighter seat
pitch, that only applies to about 1/3 of their fleet - those used on
high density routes like to the Caribbean where vacationers seem to want
cheap over comfort. The rest of the American fleet is supposed to
remain with the larger seat pitch. They haven't completely abandoned the
idea yet. | |
| |
6th July 2003, 10:55 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Guest | JetBlue adds more legroom, cuts capacity "R J Carpenter" <rcarpen@erols.com> iterated.....
>
> Somehow my name got into this item. I DISagree with the
> paragraph directly under my name, and posted to that effect.
>
Being mistook for "trice" is the equivalent of being
asked "What's a nice girl like you doing working in a plce like
this?"
I don't know what to suggest, as the sin of he who misattributed
thee is so grievous.
TMO | |
| |
7th July 2003, 11:12 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Guest | JetBlue adds more legroom, cuts capacity trice532m (trice) iterated.....
>
>
> Trice (Please notice the CAPITAL!)
>
No, ma'm.....
As in your screen name above, you are "trice" until you change
it, and any capitals or lack thereof are of your own choosing
(but please don't shout and be TRICE.
TMO | |
| |  |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM. | | |