y_p_w
Guest
Anyone understand the TSA's "3 ounce" rule?
I just recently traveled (domestic US) and didn't carry a whole lot.
However - we still needed to check in (even with the $15 first bag
charge) because we were carrying sunscreens, cosmetics, bug repellent,
and other toiletries that were more than 3 oz per bottle.
I remember back the original liquid explosive scare in 2006. Back
then the TSA relaxed their initial ruling that liquids had to be
checked in and set a 4 oz maximum. That made a lot of sense because a
lot of standard sized packaging (contact lens solutions, sunscreens,
etc) as well as travel containers were 4 oz. I've also flown
internationally (depends on the departure country), and outside the US
the limit is 100 ml (about 3.3. oz), which makes a lot of sense
because that's a common size for many toiletries - even some products
sold in the US. Even if we need to check in some larger bottles, it
would be nice if I could apply sunscreen from that 4 oz bottle before
we land.
Anyone know of any actual 3 oz bottles? I bought a few Nalgene 2 oz
bottles, but they seem a bit small. 100 ml looks good enough, but I'm
not sure if they'll allow it. I did see a box filled with discarded
containers that didn't make it past the TSA security. I also gave
about a half-case of bottled water to some curbside baggage handlers;
they stashed it and seemed to appreciate it.
A Mate
Guest
Anyone understand the TSA's "3 ounce" rule?
100ml - which is a tad more than 3oz - is the International Standard - used
worldwide for fluids etc. The TSA accept it - personal experience!
<y_p_w@***********m> wrote in message
news:cac7ff76-8b0b-456b-acff-e31fcadbf76b@i28g2000prd.************.com...
>I just recently traveled (domestic US) and didn't carry a whole lot.
> However - we still needed to check in (even with the $15 first bag
> charge) because we were carrying sunscreens, cosmetics, bug repellent,
> and other toiletries that were more than 3 oz per bottle.
>
> I remember back the original liquid explosive scare in 2006. Back
> then the TSA relaxed their initial ruling that liquids had to be
> checked in and set a 4 oz maximum. That made a lot of sense because a
> lot of standard sized packaging (contact lens solutions, sunscreens,
> etc) as well as travel containers were 4 oz. I've also flown
> internationally (depends on the departure country), and outside the US
> the limit is 100 ml (about 3.3. oz), which makes a lot of sense
> because that's a common size for many toiletries - even some products
> sold in the US. Even if we need to check in some larger bottles, it
> would be nice if I could apply sunscreen from that 4 oz bottle before
> we land.
>
> Anyone know of any actual 3 oz bottles? I bought a few Nalgene 2 oz
> bottles, but they seem a bit small. 100 ml looks good enough, but I'm
> not sure if they'll allow it. I did see a box filled with discarded
> containers that didn't make it past the TSA security. I also gave
> about a half-case of bottled water to some curbside baggage handlers;
> they stashed it and seemed to appreciate it.
singlemalt
Guest
Anyone understand the TSA's "3 ounce" rule?
>
> Anyone know of any actual 3 oz bottles? I bought a few Nalgene 2 oz
> bottles, but they seem a bit small. 100 ml looks good enough, but I'm
> not sure if they'll allow it. I did see a box filled with discarded
> containers that didn't make it past the TSA security. I also gave
> about a half-case of bottled water to some curbside baggage handlers;
> they stashed it and seemed to appreciate it.
Go to your local pharmacy and ask them to sell you some 3 oz bottles.
Nowadays they are usually plastic and so cheap that they will probably give
them to you. BTW, you cannot fill 3 oz bottles with liquor ( Scotch) and put
them in your allowable one quart zip lock bag. No booze can be carried onto
the plane, unless, perhaps, duty free.
Shawn Hirn
Guest
Anyone understand the TSA's "3 ounce" rule?
In article
<cac7ff76-8b0b-456b-acff-e31fcadbf76b@i28g2000prd.************.com>,
y_p_w@***********m wrote:
> I just recently traveled (domestic US) and didn't carry a whole lot.
> However - we still needed to check in (even with the $15 first bag
> charge) because we were carrying sunscreens, cosmetics, bug repellent,
> and other toiletries that were more than 3 oz per bottle.
>
> I remember back the original liquid explosive scare in 2006. Back
> then the TSA relaxed their initial ruling that liquids had to be
> checked in and set a 4 oz maximum. That made a lot of sense because a
> lot of standard sized packaging (contact lens solutions, sunscreens,
> etc) as well as travel containers were 4 oz. I've also flown
> internationally (depends on the departure country), and outside the US
> the limit is 100 ml (about 3.3. oz), which makes a lot of sense
> because that's a common size for many toiletries - even some products
> sold in the US. Even if we need to check in some larger bottles, it
> would be nice if I could apply sunscreen from that 4 oz bottle before
> we land.
>
> Anyone know of any actual 3 oz bottles? I bought a few Nalgene 2 oz
> bottles, but they seem a bit small. 100 ml looks good enough, but I'm
> not sure if they'll allow it. I did see a box filled with discarded
> containers that didn't make it past the TSA security. I also gave
> about a half-case of bottled water to some curbside baggage handlers;
> they stashed it and seemed to appreciate it.
Your mistake is trying to make sense out of the non-sensical. That three
ounce rule makes no sense at all.
Shawn Hirn
Guest
Anyone understand the TSA's "3 ounce" rule?
In article <Xns9C0195C2EED4CVeebleFetzer@216.250.184.7>,
Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com> wrote:
> In
> news:9a67135e-d685-440b-bcbc-99c619a7b7c5@d25g2000prn.************.com
> y_p_w@***********m wrote:
>
> > I still don't quite understand why it was permanently set at 3 oz (or
> > even 100 ml) like there's some sort of scientific accuracy to the
> > number.
>
> They probably set it at 3 oz precisely to give the impression that
> there's some sort of scientific accuracy to the number. An odd (and
> inconvenient) number like that makes it seem that a lot of research and
> thought went into its determination.
>
> If they'd had their wits about them, they'd have used the 100ml figure
> to make it seem even more authoritative, metric measures being quite
> mysterious to many Americans.
If the TSA really cared about passenger safety, they would ban all
liquids from carryon luggage, not just three ounce containers. Any
would-be bomber can still smuggle on explosives by just keeping them in
multiple 3 oz. containers now. This rule is a joke and the only people
who are inconvenienced by it are us law abiding passengers.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules