+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Anyone understand the TSA's "3 ounce" rule?

  1. #1
    y_p_w
    Guest y_p_w's Avatar

    Default Anyone understand the TSA's "3 ounce" rule?

    I just recently traveled (domestic US) and didn't carry a whole lot.
    However - we still needed to check in (even with the $15 first bag
    charge) because we were carrying sunscreens, cosmetics, bug repellent,
    and other toiletries that were more than 3 oz per bottle.

    I remember back the original liquid explosive scare in 2006. Back
    then the TSA relaxed their initial ruling that liquids had to be
    checked in and set a 4 oz maximum. That made a lot of sense because a
    lot of standard sized packaging (contact lens solutions, sunscreens,
    etc) as well as travel containers were 4 oz. I've also flown
    internationally (depends on the departure country), and outside the US
    the limit is 100 ml (about 3.3. oz), which makes a lot of sense
    because that's a common size for many toiletries - even some products
    sold in the US. Even if we need to check in some larger bottles, it
    would be nice if I could apply sunscreen from that 4 oz bottle before
    we land.

    Anyone know of any actual 3 oz bottles? I bought a few Nalgene 2 oz
    bottles, but they seem a bit small. 100 ml looks good enough, but I'm
    not sure if they'll allow it. I did see a box filled with discarded
    containers that didn't make it past the TSA security. I also gave
    about a half-case of bottled water to some curbside baggage handlers;
    they stashed it and seemed to appreciate it.


  2. #2
    A Mate
    Guest A Mate's Avatar

    Default Anyone understand the TSA's "3 ounce" rule?

    100ml - which is a tad more than 3oz - is the International Standard - used
    worldwide for fluids etc. The TSA accept it - personal experience!

    <y_p_w@***********m> wrote in message
    news:cac7ff76-8b0b-456b-acff-e31fcadbf76b@i28g2000prd.************.com...
    >I just recently traveled (domestic US) and didn't carry a whole lot.
    > However - we still needed to check in (even with the $15 first bag
    > charge) because we were carrying sunscreens, cosmetics, bug repellent,
    > and other toiletries that were more than 3 oz per bottle.
    >
    > I remember back the original liquid explosive scare in 2006. Back
    > then the TSA relaxed their initial ruling that liquids had to be
    > checked in and set a 4 oz maximum. That made a lot of sense because a
    > lot of standard sized packaging (contact lens solutions, sunscreens,
    > etc) as well as travel containers were 4 oz. I've also flown
    > internationally (depends on the departure country), and outside the US
    > the limit is 100 ml (about 3.3. oz), which makes a lot of sense
    > because that's a common size for many toiletries - even some products
    > sold in the US. Even if we need to check in some larger bottles, it
    > would be nice if I could apply sunscreen from that 4 oz bottle before
    > we land.
    >
    > Anyone know of any actual 3 oz bottles? I bought a few Nalgene 2 oz
    > bottles, but they seem a bit small. 100 ml looks good enough, but I'm
    > not sure if they'll allow it. I did see a box filled with discarded
    > containers that didn't make it past the TSA security. I also gave
    > about a half-case of bottled water to some curbside baggage handlers;
    > they stashed it and seemed to appreciate it.

  3. #3
    singlemalt
    Guest singlemalt's Avatar

    Default Anyone understand the TSA's "3 ounce" rule?


    >
    > Anyone know of any actual 3 oz bottles? I bought a few Nalgene 2 oz
    > bottles, but they seem a bit small. 100 ml looks good enough, but I'm
    > not sure if they'll allow it. I did see a box filled with discarded
    > containers that didn't make it past the TSA security. I also gave
    > about a half-case of bottled water to some curbside baggage handlers;
    > they stashed it and seemed to appreciate it.


    Go to your local pharmacy and ask them to sell you some 3 oz bottles.
    Nowadays they are usually plastic and so cheap that they will probably give
    them to you. BTW, you cannot fill 3 oz bottles with liquor ( Scotch) and put
    them in your allowable one quart zip lock bag. No booze can be carried onto
    the plane, unless, perhaps, duty free.

  4. #4
    Shawn Hirn
    Guest Shawn Hirn's Avatar

    Default Anyone understand the TSA's "3 ounce" rule?

    In article
    <cac7ff76-8b0b-456b-acff-e31fcadbf76b@i28g2000prd.************.com>,
    y_p_w@***********m wrote:

    > I just recently traveled (domestic US) and didn't carry a whole lot.
    > However - we still needed to check in (even with the $15 first bag
    > charge) because we were carrying sunscreens, cosmetics, bug repellent,
    > and other toiletries that were more than 3 oz per bottle.
    >
    > I remember back the original liquid explosive scare in 2006. Back
    > then the TSA relaxed their initial ruling that liquids had to be
    > checked in and set a 4 oz maximum. That made a lot of sense because a
    > lot of standard sized packaging (contact lens solutions, sunscreens,
    > etc) as well as travel containers were 4 oz. I've also flown
    > internationally (depends on the departure country), and outside the US
    > the limit is 100 ml (about 3.3. oz), which makes a lot of sense
    > because that's a common size for many toiletries - even some products
    > sold in the US. Even if we need to check in some larger bottles, it
    > would be nice if I could apply sunscreen from that 4 oz bottle before
    > we land.
    >
    > Anyone know of any actual 3 oz bottles? I bought a few Nalgene 2 oz
    > bottles, but they seem a bit small. 100 ml looks good enough, but I'm
    > not sure if they'll allow it. I did see a box filled with discarded
    > containers that didn't make it past the TSA security. I also gave
    > about a half-case of bottled water to some curbside baggage handlers;
    > they stashed it and seemed to appreciate it.


    Your mistake is trying to make sense out of the non-sensical. That three
    ounce rule makes no sense at all.

  5. #5
    Shawn Hirn
    Guest Shawn Hirn's Avatar

    Default Anyone understand the TSA's "3 ounce" rule?

    In article <Xns9C0195C2EED4CVeebleFetzer@216.250.184.7>,
    Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com> wrote:

    > In
    > news:9a67135e-d685-440b-bcbc-99c619a7b7c5@d25g2000prn.************.com
    > y_p_w@***********m wrote:
    >
    > > I still don't quite understand why it was permanently set at 3 oz (or
    > > even 100 ml) like there's some sort of scientific accuracy to the
    > > number.

    >
    > They probably set it at 3 oz precisely to give the impression that
    > there's some sort of scientific accuracy to the number. An odd (and
    > inconvenient) number like that makes it seem that a lot of research and
    > thought went into its determination.
    >
    > If they'd had their wits about them, they'd have used the 100ml figure
    > to make it seem even more authoritative, metric measures being quite
    > mysterious to many Americans.


    If the TSA really cared about passenger safety, they would ban all
    liquids from carryon luggage, not just three ounce containers. Any
    would-be bomber can still smuggle on explosives by just keeping them in
    multiple 3 oz. containers now. This rule is a joke and the only people
    who are inconvenienced by it are us law abiding passengers.

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO 3.5.0 RC2