David Cantrell wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 08:32:16PM +0100, craig.richmond@virgin.net
> wrote:
>
>> Just been reading on Wikipedia that Amersham might be going down to
>> having just two trains an hour? Is that not a really poor service?
>
> Not really. It's a lot better than most places, and there's plenty of
> places in London with that sort of service.
>
> And in the area just outside London that is still covered by TfL (like
> Amersham is), Epsom Downs has only one train an hour. Now *that's*
> poor service.
Sudbury & Harrow Road has a much poorer service.