Jesper Lauridsen

On 2008-06-10, David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*) <d4g4h4.uk> wrote:
> Go Fig <gofig@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <1iic7d8.9xn9ha1awo7h9N%d4g4h4.uk>, David Horne,
>> _the_ chancellor (*) <d4g4h4.uk> wrote:
>>
>> > Go Fig <gofig@mac.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > In article <1iic632.nh9nr11e39zbvN%d4g4h4.uk>, David Horne,
>> > > _the_ chancellor (*) <d4g4h4.uk> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) <evgmsop@> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Tim C. wrote:
>> > > > > > On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:41:36 -0400, terrable wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> You must live in a very strange place as throwing yourself from a
>> > > > > >> high
>> > > > > >> building is very illegal around here.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > where's "here"?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > SFAIK, it's "illegal" most places (as is suicide), but if the
>> > > > > attempt is successful, the "legality" is moot, n'est-ce pas?
>> > > >
>> > > > It's not moot if you're the victim of someone's suicide, which can
>> > > > happen.
>> > >
>> > > And that victim, rightly, will sue your estate.
>> >
>> > Only a twisted mind like yours would think that an appropriate statement
>> > in the context.
>>
>> I correctly, dealt with the "legality" issue.
>
> WGAF.

You do. As quoted above Evelyn wrote:

>> > > > > SFAIK, it's "illegal" most places (as is suicide), but if the
>> > > > > attempt is successful, the "legality" is moot, n'est-ce pas?

and you replied:

>> > > > It's not moot if you're the victim of someone's suicide, which can
>> > > > happen.

So what were you talking about?