"al Guacamole" <aet@lava.net> wrote in message
news:1210985100-sch@news.lava.net...
>
> On May 15, 4:15 pm, "Jerry Okamura" <okamuraj...@hawaii.> wrote:
>
>> Being "realistic" is recognizing that legalized gambling in Hawaii,
>> has some advantages that may out weigh the disadvantages. Being
>> "realistic" is
>> recognizing the simple fact that the cost of living is high in Hawaii.
>> Being "realistic" is recognizing that this state is not the friendliest
>> state to businesses. Being "realistic" is recognizing that rules and
>> regulation and "mandates" on what business can and should do, does not
>> help the business. Being "realistic" is recognizing the people in the
>> state have a hard time finding a good paying job that is sufficient to be
>> able to
>> afford the things that most people in most states take for granted.
>
> Unfortunately, you have a difficult time being "realistic". Seems that
> you're more biased and prejudgemental than realistic. The economic
> benefits are probably less than the tourist business, and the downside
> is that casino gambling can do great harm to our society and community
> and existing businesses here already.
>
What I said has nothing to do with whether we have legalized gambling or
not. What I said is the fact. Can you prove that what I said is incorrect?