"Dave" <mariners_nukethis@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:t5vh13lup233ibph80m07pkrn0n15qa1h0@...
> Well stated!
>
> Of all the above, 2 knew the answer and posted proper replies....
>
> Others could not wait to trumpet their attitude... (sigh)
>
> ..a lot of noise on this NG, and it is not from MX...
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8 Apr 2007 06:16:12 -0700, wesley.hall@ wrote:
>
>>
>>> It depends on the situation, but for your specific example...
>>
>>As a real student pilot (real as in, my feet leave the ground) I would
>>like to thank FlyCherokee and BT for their informative posts.
>>
>>Guys, I do appreciate the frustration with Mxsmaniac, but I sometimes
>>think (having lurked in this group for a while) that you are all a
>>little too quick to show-off your razor-sharp wit in response to his/
>>her posts. If you are going to respond, why not do it productively?
>>Believe me, there are some of us here that do appreciate your
>>experience and insight. It is even interesting to see how the
>>experience of real flight conflicts with a simulated experience (the
>>obvious, of course, being the severity of a 'crash' :o))
>>
>>I am certain that anyone with the brain power to safely operate an
>>aircraft, has the ability to keep on topic without being drawn into a
>>flamewar.... despite Mxsmaniacs 'crosswind' effect.
>>
>>Thanks.
>
I agree 100%. I have no problems reading his posts or ligit responses. It
is the contant flaming of MX that is clogging up this newsgroup. Let me
repeat this. It is the flaming of MX that is the problem here!!!
Danny Deger