Thanx Dave... now we wait for MXs inevitable counter replies.. I made the
error and got into many debates, if he does not get "his" answer.. he keeps
pushing and not accepting the advice of many with 30+yrs experience. I will
comment on other inputs.. but I will not answer MX.
It seems he is a walking... wait.. sitting wikepedia... on so many topics...
remember that wikepedia is written by less than average people with
something to say... yes there is knowledge there... not to discount
wikepedia.. but it is un moderated.
BT
"Dave" <mariners_nukethis@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:t5vh13lup233ibph80m07pkrn0n15qa1h0@...
> Well stated!
>
> Of all the above, 2 knew the answer and posted proper replies....
>
> Others could not wait to trumpet their attitude... (sigh)
>
> ..a lot of noise on this NG, and it is not from MX...
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8 Apr 2007 06:16:12 -0700, wesley.hall@ wrote:
>
>>
>>> It depends on the situation, but for your specific example...
>>
>>As a real student pilot (real as in, my feet leave the ground) I would
>>like to thank FlyCherokee and BT for their informative posts.
>>
>>Guys, I do appreciate the frustration with Mxsmaniac, but I sometimes
>>think (having lurked in this group for a while) that you are all a
>>little too quick to show-off your razor-sharp wit in response to his/
>>her posts. If you are going to respond, why not do it productively?
>>Believe me, there are some of us here that do appreciate your
>>experience and insight. It is even interesting to see how the
>>experience of real flight conflicts with a simulated experience (the
>>obvious, of course, being the severity of a 'crash' :o))
>>
>>I am certain that anyone with the brain power to safely operate an
>>aircraft, has the ability to keep on topic without being drawn into a
>>flamewar.... despite Mxsmaniacs 'crosswind' effect.
>>
>>Thanks.
>